Literature DB >> 7927852

Predictive performance of two software packages (USC*PACK PC and Abbott PKS system) for the individualization of amikacin dosage in intensive care unit patients.

T Gauthier1, B Lacarelle, F Marre, P H Villard, J Catalin, A Durand.   

Abstract

Many dosing methods (nomogram, pharmacokinetic methods, Bayesian methods) can be used for the individualization of amikacin dosing. Among these methods, it is now well known that the Bayesian method provides a rapid and accurate means for individualizing dosage requirements for patients with diverse pharmacokinetic profiles. However, one problem has not been fully resolved. Should we use population-based parameters reflecting the patient population being monitored or should we used general population parameters? The aim of this study was to answer this question using two widely used software programs (USC*PACK PC and Abbott PKS system) and two different population parameters sets. Predictive performance of these methods was assessed with respect to the prediction of amikacin serum concentrations in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Our results show that the differences between predicted and measured concentrations were unbiased when the population parameters used were adequate. Precision values were comparable with previously reported values. The predictive performance of the two tested software programs are very comparable in ICU patients. In addition, we demonstrated that performance can be enhanced when using population-based parameters which reflect the patient population being monitored. It is therefore advisable for each user to properly characterize each particular patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7927852     DOI: 10.1016/0020-7101(94)90104-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biomed Comput        ISSN: 0020-7101


  6 in total

Review 1.  Benchmarking therapeutic drug monitoring software: a review of available computer tools.

Authors:  Aline Fuchs; Chantal Csajka; Yann Thoma; Thierry Buclin; Nicolas Widmer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Can Population Pharmacokinetics of Antibiotics be Extrapolated? Implications of External Evaluations.

Authors:  Yu Cheng; Chen-Yu Wang; Zi-Ran Li; Yan Pan; Mao-Bai Liu; Zheng Jiao
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetics of drugs used in critically ill adults.

Authors:  B M Power; A M Forbes; P V van Heerden; K F Ilett
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Influence of clinical diagnosis in the population pharmacokinetics of amikacin in intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  S Romano; M Del Mar Fdez de Gatta; V Calvo; E Mendez; A Domínguez-Gil; J M Lanao
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 5.  Individualised antibiotic dosing for patients who are critically ill: challenges and potential solutions.

Authors:  Jason A Roberts; Mohd H Abdul-Aziz; Jeffrey Lipman; Johan W Mouton; Alexander A Vinks; Timothy W Felton; William W Hope; Andras Farkas; Michael N Neely; Jerome J Schentag; George Drusano; Otto R Frey; Ursula Theuretzbacher; Joseph L Kuti
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 25.071

6.  Amikacin population pharmacokinetics in critically ill Kuwaiti patients.

Authors:  Kamal M Matar; Yousef Al-lanqawi; Kefaya Abdul-Malek; Roger Jelliffe
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.