Literature DB >> 7925003

Dissecting the temporal requirements for homeotic gene function.

J Castelli-Gair1, S Greig, G Micklem, M Akam.   

Abstract

Homeotic genes confer identity to the different segments of Drosophila. These genes are expressed in many cell types over long periods of time. To determine when the homeotic genes are required for specific developmental events we have expressed the Ultrabithorax, abdominal-A and Abdominal-Bm proteins at different times during development using the GAL4 targeting technique. We find that early transient homeotic gene expression has no lasting effects on the differentiation of the larval epidermis, but it switches the fate of other cell types irreversibly (e.g. the spiracle primordia). We describe one cell type in the peripheral nervous system that makes sequential, independent responses to homeotic gene expression. We also provide evidence that supports the hypothesis of in vivo competition between the bithorax complex proteins for the regulation of their down-stream targets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7925003     DOI: 10.1242/dev.120.7.1983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  42 in total

1.  Functional evolution of the Ultrabithorax protein.

Authors:  J K Grenier; S B Carroll
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Huckebein-mediated autoregulation of Glide/Gcm triggers glia specification.

Authors:  Rossana De Iaco; Laurent Soustelle; Martial Kammerer; Sandro Sorrentino; Cécile Jacques; Angela Giangrande
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  The RhoGAP crossveinless-c links trachealess and EGFR signaling to cell shape remodeling in Drosophila tracheal invagination.

Authors:  Véronique Brodu; Jordi Casanova
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  A genetic screen of the Drosophila X chromosome for mutations that modify Deformed function.

Authors:  B Florence; W McGinnis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Regulation of Hox gene expression and posterior development by the Xenopus caudal homologue Xcad3.

Authors:  H V Isaacs; M E Pownall; J M Slack
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-06-15       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Functional similarity in appendage specification by the Ultrabithorax and abdominal-A Drosophila HOX genes.

Authors:  F Casares; M Calleja; E Sánchez-Herrero
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-08-01       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Ovule development: identification of stage-specific and tissue-specific cDNAs.

Authors:  J A Nadeau; X S Zhang; J Li; S D O'Neill
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 11.277

8.  Compartmental modulation of abdominal Hox expression by engrailed and sloppy-paired patterns the fly ectoderm.

Authors:  Brian Gebelein; Richard S Mann
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 3.582

9.  Segment-specific neuronal subtype specification by the integration of anteroposterior and temporal cues.

Authors:  Daniel Karlsson; Magnus Baumgardt; Stefan Thor
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Evolution of a novel appendage ground plan in water striders is driven by changes in the Hox gene Ultrabithorax.

Authors:  Abderrahman Khila; Ehab Abouheif; Locke Rowe
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.