Literature DB >> 7923232

Risks of using siphon-reducing devices.

P Kremer1, A Aschoff, S Kunze.   

Abstract

Reducing the cerebrospinal flow is the task of siphon-reducing devices (SRD). This paper shows test results with SRD, with special reference to the aspect of dysfunction of shunt valves in combination with anti-siphon. The local influences acting on the anti-siphon at the place of implantation and the dependence of the pressure range were examined as possible causes of dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1994        PMID： 7923232     DOI： 10.1007/bf00301159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst        ISSN： 0256-7040            Impact factor:   1.475


  12 in total

1.  The relationship between ventricular fluid pressure and body position in normal subjects and subjects with shunts: a telemetric study.

Authors:  P H Chapman; E R Cosman; M A Arnold
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Fluid flow performance of a new siphon-control device for ventricular shunts.

Authors:  D Horton; M Pollay
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  [Ventriculo-peritoneal shunt malfunction with anti-siphon device in normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Report of three cases].

Authors:  M Seida; U Ito; S Tomida; S Yamazaki; Y Inaba
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 1.742

4.  Experience with antisyphon devices: successes and complications.

Authors:  E Jaskolska; A E MacKinnon
Journal:  Z Kinderchir       Date:  1988-12

5.  Cerebrospinal fluid shunts: an experimental evaluation of flow rates and pressure values in the anti-siphon valve.

Authors:  J L Fox; H D Portnoy; R R Shulte
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1973-09

6.  Anti-siphon and reversible occlusion valves for shunting in hydrocephalus and preventing post-shunt subdural hematomas.

Authors:  H D Portnoy; R R Schulte; J L Fox; P D Croissant; L Tripp
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Reexpansion of previously collapsed ventricles: the slit ventricle syndrome.

Authors:  M D Hyde-Rowan; H L Rekate; F E Nulsen
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Experiences with the anti-siphon device (ASD) in shunt therapy of pediatric hydrocephalus.

Authors:  R Gruber; P Jenny; B Herzog
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  The incidence and management of the slit ventricle syndrome.

Authors:  W Serlo; A L Saukkonen; E Heikkinen; L von Wendt
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  Symptomatic progressive ventriculomegaly in hydrocephalics with patent shunts and antisiphon devices.

Authors:  D C McCullough
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 4.654
View more
  4 in total

1.  A new self-adjusting flow-regulating device for shunting of CSF.

Authors:  N Paes
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Overdrainage and shunt technology. A critical comparison of programmable, hydrostatic and variable-resistance valves and flow-reducing devices.

Authors:  A Aschoff; P Kremer; C Benesch; K Fruh; A Klank; S Kunze
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  The Role of Antisiphon Devices in the Prevention of Central Ventricular Catheter Obliteration for Hydrocephalus: A 15-Years Institution's Experience Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Dimitrios Panagopoulos; Georgios Strantzalis; Maro Gavra; Efstathios Boviatsis; Stefanos Korfias
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-01

4.  [Treatment of hydrocephalus].

Authors:  M Kiefer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.635
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.