Literature DB >> 2338577

Fluid flow performance of a new siphon-control device for ventricular shunts.

D Horton1, M Pollay.   

Abstract

Most available cerebrospinal fluid diversion systems utilize differential-pressure valves that often induce overshunting, resulting in complications due to the siphoning of fluid from the ventricular system when the patient is in the erect position. A new siphon-control device (SCD) was tested alone and in combination with four types of differential-pressure valves with low, medium, and high opening pressures (namely PS Medical, Heyer-Schulte, Cordis-Hakim, and Codman valves). The valve inlet and outlet pressures were measured at several fluid inflow rates between 2.0 and 50.0 ml/hr. Inlet pressure and valve resistance were determined when the outlet pressures of the differential-pressure valve or SCD were varied between 0 and -60 cm H2O. Of the differential-pressures valves tested, none provided protection against siphoning without the distal connection of the SCD. The SCD allowed all differential-pressure valves tested to maintain atmospheric pressure regardless of the outlet pressure. The SCD performs in a manner similar to the older anti-siphon device, but with some improvements in design and construction. The results of this investigation suggest that the increased resistance due to the inline SCD is not functionally significant when added to the conventional valve systems with low opening pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2338577     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1990.72.6.0926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  9 in total

1.  Rationale and methodology of the multicenter pediatric cerebrospinal fluid shunt design trial. Pediatric Hydrocephalus Treatment Evaluation Group.

Authors:  J M Drake; J Kestle
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Risks of using siphon-reducing devices.

Authors:  P Kremer; A Aschoff; S Kunze
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 3.  Antisiphon device: A review of existing mechanisms and clinical applications to prevent overdrainage in shunted hydrocephalic patients.

Authors:  An-Ping Huang; Lu-Ting Kuo; Dar-Ming Lai; Shih-Hung Yang; Meng-Fai Kuo
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Hydrocephalus: the zero ICP ventricle shunt (ZIPS) to control gravity shunt flow. A clinical study in 56 patients.

Authors:  E L Foltz; J Blanks; R Meyer
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Adjustments in gravitational valves for the treatment of childhood hydrocephalus-a retrospective survey.

Authors:  Anna Felicitas Gebert; Matthias Schulz; Hannes Haberl; Ulrich-Wilhelm Thomale
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  The Delta Valve: a physiologic shunt system.

Authors:  D A Watson
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Slit-ventricle syndrome in shunt operated children.

Authors:  O Major; I Fedorcsák; L Sipos; P Hantos; E Kónya; I Dobronyi; E Paraicz
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Is there a reasonable differential indication for different hydrocephalus shunt systems?

Authors:  H A Trost
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.475

9.  Impact of ventricular-peritoneal shunt valve design on clinical outcome of pediatric patients with hydrocephalus: Lessons learned from randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Reid Hoshide; Hal Meltzer; Cecilia Dalle-Ore; David Gonda; Daniel Guillaume; Clark C Chen
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-04-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.