Literature DB >> 7920493

Colorectal cancer screening and quality of life.

D K Whynes1, A R Neilson, M H Robinson, J D Hardcastle.   

Abstract

To evaluate the quality of life of patients following surgery for colorectal cancer, and to compare the quality of life between patients whose cancer was detected as a result of faecal occult blood screening with that of patients whose cancer presented symptomatically, an analysis was conducted within the context of the randomized controlled trial of colorectal cancer screening, University Hospital, Nottingham, UK. A total of 418 survivors of the trial's test and control groups and 33 randomly selected cancer patients completed quality of life questionnaires (Nottingham Health Profile and Health Measurement Questionnaire). The mode of entry to diagnosis and treatment (screening vs. non-screening) appeared to exert no major impact on post-intervention quality of life. The stage of cancer progression was not closely related to outcome life quality. A quality of life coefficient for surviving patients based on the Rosser classification was estimated to lie within the range 0.948-0.981. This figure accords well with the estimates of other studies of interventions in populations of similar age. Overall, there are no grounds for believing that faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer per se significantly influences patients' post-intervention quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7920493     DOI: 10.1007/bf00435384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  25 in total

1.  Cost-effective screening strategies for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D K Whynes; A R Walker; J D Hardcastle
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1992-03

2.  The hospital costs of diagnostic procedures for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A R Walker; D K Whynes; J O Chamberlain; J D Hardcastle
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Economics of coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  A Williams
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-08-03

4.  The Nottingham health profile: a useful tool for epidemiologists?

Authors:  P Kind; R Carr-Hill
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 5.  Development of a comprehensive quality of life measurement tool: CARES.

Authors:  C A Schag; R L Heinrich
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.990

6.  The quality of life after rectal excision for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  N S Williams; D Johnston
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology.

Authors:  N K Aaronson; S Ahmedzai; B Bergman; M Bullinger; A Cull; N J Duez; A Filiberti; H Flechtner; S B Fleishman; J C de Haes
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-03-03       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Breast cancer screening and cost-effectiveness; policy alternatives, quality of life considerations and the possible impact of uncertain factors.

Authors:  H J de Koning; B M van Ineveld; G J van Oortmarssen; J C de Haes; H J Collette; J H Hendriks; P J van der Maas
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1991-10-21       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Repeated screening for colorectal cancer with fecal occult blood test. A prospective randomized study at Funen, Denmark.

Authors:  O Kronborg; C Fenger; J Olsen; K Bech; O Søndergaard
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  When is treatment for cancer economically justified? Discussion paper.

Authors:  B Jennett; M Buxton
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 18.000

View more
  6 in total

1.  Symptoms before and after surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D K Whynes; A R Neilson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Comparison of quality of life in patients undergoing abdominoperineal extirpation or anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  M M Grumann; E M Noack; I A Hoffmann; P M Schlag
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Predictors of health-related quality of life and association with survival may identify colorectal cancer patients at high risk of poor prognosis.

Authors:  Monica E Reyes; Yuanqing Ye; Yeling Zhou; Alexander Liang; Scott Kopetz; M Alma Rodriquez; Xifeng Wu; Michelle A T Hildebrandt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Emotional impact of screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ruth E Collins; Laureen M Lopez; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Cost-utility analysis of genetic screening in families of patients with germline MUTYH mutations.

Authors:  Maartje Nielsen; Frederik J Hes; Hans F A Vasen; Wilbert B van den Hout
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2007-07-02       Impact factor: 2.103

6.  Population screening for colorectal cancer: the implications of an ageing population.

Authors:  D A L Macafee; M Waller; D K Whynes; S Moss; J H Scholefield
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.