Literature DB >> 7920217

Prognostic implications of bone marrow culturing in myelodysplastic syndrome: a retrospective analysis.

R Raymakers1, F Preijers, J Boezeman, E Rutten, T De Witte.   

Abstract

To assess the predictive role of bone marrow culturing in MDS in vitro data of 205 patients were correlated with progression to AML and survival. Both in vitro growth pattern and in vitro differentiation were significantly predictive for progression to AML. Other predictive parameters were FAB classification and the presence of cytogenetic abnormalities in all metaphases analysed. Since FAB classification and in vitro bone marrow culturing appeared confounding variables, the in vitro data were analysed for high risk patients, RAEB and RAEBt and low risk patients, RA and RARS. In 91/110 RAEB(t) patients the estimated chance to develop AML was 25% in cases of normal growth versus 62% if abnormal (p < 0.06). In 82/87 RA(RS) patients the estimated chance to develop AML was 5% and 40% respectively (p = 0.0004). After AML progression median survival was only 2 months (0-16.1 months). In RAEB(t) patients bone marrow culturing did not discriminate for better survival, although a trend was shown. The estimated median survival was 16 months if growth was normal versus 8 months if abnormal (p = 0.07). In RA(RS) patients the median survival also was not significantly different, 31 versus 22 months respectively (p = 0.39). However, if in vitro growth and differentiation were both normal a significant difference in median survival was observed, 35 versus 22 months (p = 0.016). In conclusion, in vitro bone marrow culturing has predictive value for AML development in RA(RS) patients. In RAEB(t), due to many patients dying early in cytopenia, the predictive value is less pronounced. Especially normal growth in RA(RS) patients makes progression to AML very unlikely and these patients should be considered for a supportive approach. In RA(RS) patients with normal growth and differentiation (about 25% of all patients) in vitro bone marrow culturing also predicts a better survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7920217     DOI: 10.3109/10428199409049656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma        ISSN: 1026-8022


  6 in total

1.  Biological and clinical significance of clonogenic assays in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  D Marisavljević; Z Rolović; D Sefer; N Basara; D Ilić; D Bosković; M Colović
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Long-term survivors in myelodysplastic syndromes: clinical and biological characteristics.

Authors:  Dragomir Marisavljević; Zoran Rolović; Darinka Bosković; Milica Colović
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Hypocellular myelodysplastic syndromes: clinical and biological significance.

Authors:  Dragomir Marisavljevic; Vesna Cemerikic; Zoran Rolovic; Darinka Boskovic; Milica Colovic
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Myelofibrosis in primary myelodysplastic syndromes: clinical and biological significance.

Authors:  D Marisavljević; Z Rolović; V Cemerikić; D Bosković; M Colović
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 5.  Diagnostic and prognostic value of colony formation of hematopoietic progenitor cells in myeloid malignancies.

Authors:  Leopold Ohler; Klaus Geissler; Wolfgang Hinterberger
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2003-08-14       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 6.  FAB classification of myelodysplastic syndromes: merits and controversies.

Authors:  G E Verhoef; S Pittaluga; C De Wolf-Peeters; M A Boogaerts
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.673

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.