Literature DB >> 7916228

Do women with acute myocardial infarction receive the same treatment as men?

K W Clarke1, D Gray, N A Keating, J R Hampton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether women with acute myocardial infarction in the Nottingham health district receive the same therapeutic interventions as their male counterparts.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: University and City Hospitals, Nottingham. PATIENTS: All patients admitted with a suspected myocardial infarction during 1989 and 1990. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Route and timing of admission to hospital, ward of admission, treatment, interventions in hospital, and mortality.
RESULTS: Women with myocardial infarction took longer to arrive in hospital than men. They were less likely to be admitted to the coronary care unit and were therefore also less likely to receive thrombolytic treatment. They seemed to have more severe infarcts, with higher Killip classes, and had a slightly higher mortality during admission. They were less likely than men to receive secondary prophylaxis by being discharged taking beta blockers or aspirin.
CONCLUSIONS: Survival chances both in hospital and after discharge in women with acute myocardial infarction are reduced because they do not have the same opportunity for therapeutic intervention as men.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Nottingham; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7916228      PMCID: PMC2541441          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.309.6954.563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  11 in total

1.  Save the normal foreskin.

Authors:  A Gordon; J Collin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-01-02

2.  Management of myocardial infarction: implications for current policy derived from the Nottingham Heart Attack Register.

Authors:  J M Rowley; P Mounser; E A Harrison; A M Skene; J R Hampton
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1992-03

3.  Treatment of myocardial infarction in a coronary care unit. A two year experience with 250 patients.

Authors:  T Killip; J T Kimball
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1967-10       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Prognosis of women with newly diagnosed coronary heart disease--a comparison with course of disease among men.

Authors:  E Weinblatt; S Shapiro; C W Frank
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Impact of hospital thrombolysis policy on out-of-hospital response to suspected myocardial infarction.

Authors:  D Gray; N A Keating; J Murdock; A M Skene; J R Hampton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-03-13       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Effects of gender and race on prognosis after myocardial infarction: adverse prognosis for women, particularly black women.

Authors:  G H Tofler; P H Stone; J E Muller; S N Willich; V G Davis; W K Poole; H W Strauss; J T Willerson; A S Jaffe; T Robertson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Patterns of coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality in the sexes: a 26-year follow-up of the Framingham population.

Authors:  D J Lerner; W B Kannel
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  Trends in cardiovascular disease mortality in industrialized countries since 1950.

Authors:  K Uemura; Z Pisa
Journal:  World Health Stat Q       Date:  1988

9.  Acute myocardial infarction in women: influence of gender on mortality and prognostic variables.

Authors:  H Dittrich; E Gilpin; P Nicod; G Cali; H Henning; J Ross
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1988-07-01       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Sensitivity and specificity of the initial working diagnosis in acute myocardial infarction: implications for thrombolysis.

Authors:  D Gray; J R Hampton
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 7.196

View more
  35 in total

1.  Sex inequalities in access to care for patients with diabetes in primary care: questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Julia Hippisley-Cox; Janet Yates; Mike Pringle; Carol Coupland; Vicky Hammersley
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Criteria for drug usage review of thrombolytics in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  S McGlynn
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Physicians' attitudes toward preventive therapy for coronary artery disease: is there a gender bias?

Authors:  Akranm Abuful; Yori Gidron; Yaakov Henkin
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.882

4.  Audit suggests that use of aspirin is rising in coronary heart disease.

Authors:  R King; J Denne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-12-02

5.  Coronary artery disease and women.

Authors:  G Jackson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-09-03

6.  Gender differences in the management and outcome of patients with acute coronary artery disease.

Authors:  R A Raine; N A Black; T J Bowker; D A Wood
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Selection factors for the use of thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: a population based study of current practice in the United Kingdom. The European Secondary Prevention Study Group.

Authors:  D Ketley; K L Woods
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-09

8.  Educational inequalities in mortality and associated risk factors: German--versus French-speaking Switzerland.

Authors:  David Faeh; Matthias Bopp
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 9.  Life with and without heart disease among women and men over 50.

Authors:  Eileen M Crimmins; Mark D Hayward; Hiroshi Ueda; Yasuhiko Saito; Jung Ki Kim
Journal:  J Women Aging       Date:  2008

10.  Chest pain and acute coronary syndrome in octogenarians admitted to the Emergency Department.

Authors:  James Samir Díaz-Betancur; Juan Manuel Martínez; Juan Gabriel Zapata; Isabel Marín-Orozco
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 3.636

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.