Literature DB >> 7911971

Hox proteins have different affinities for a consensus DNA site that correlate with the positions of their genes on the hox cluster.

I Pellerin1, C Schnabel, K M Catron, C Abate.   

Abstract

The hox genes, members of a family of essential developmental regulators, have the intriguing property that their expression in the developing murine embryo is colinear with their chromosomal organization. Members of the hox gene family share a conserved DNA binding domain, termed the homeodomain, which mediates interactions of Hox proteins with DNA regulatory elements in the transcriptional control regions of target genes. In this study, we characterized the DNA binding properties of five representative members of the Hox family: HoxA5, HoxB4, HoxA7, HoxC8, and HoxB1. To facilitate a comparative analysis of their DNA binding properties, we produced the homeodomain regions of these Hox proteins in Escherichia coli and obtained highly purified polypeptides. We showed that these Hox proteins interact in vitro with a common consensus DNA site that contains the motif (C/G)TAATTG. We further showed that the Hox proteins recognize the consensus DNA site in vivo, as determined by their ability to activate transcription through this site in transient transfection assays. Although they interact optimally with the consensus DNA site, the Hox proteins exhibit subtle, but distinct, preferences for DNA sites that contain variations of the nucleotides within the consensus motif. In addition to their modest differences in DNA binding specificities, the Hox proteins also vary in their relative affinities for DNA. Intriguingly, their relative affinities correlate with the positions of their respective genes on the hox cluster. These findings suggest that subtle differences in DNA binding specificity combined with differences in DNA binding affinity constitute features of the "Hox code" that contribute to the selective functions of Hox proteins during murine embryogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7911971      PMCID: PMC358825          DOI: 10.1128/mcb.14.7.4532-4545.1994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  64 in total

1.  The sequence specificity of homeodomain-DNA interaction.

Authors:  C Desplan; J Theis; P H O'Farrell
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1988-09-23       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Regulation of cytomegalovirus gene expression: alpha and beta promoters are trans activated by viral functions in permissive human fibroblasts.

Authors:  R R Spaete; E S Mocarski
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  The bicoid protein determines position in the Drosophila embryo in a concentration-dependent manner.

Authors:  W Driever; C Nüsslein-Volhard
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1988-07-01       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 4.  The molecular genetics of embryonic pattern formation in Drosophila.

Authors:  P W Ingham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-09-01       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Divergent homeo box proteins recognize similar DNA sequences in Drosophila.

Authors:  T Hoey; M Levine
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-04-28       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Primary structure and nuclear localization of a murine homeodomain protein.

Authors:  M Kessel; F Schulze; M Fibi; P Gruss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Homeo boxes in the study of development.

Authors:  W J Gehring
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-06-05       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Sequencing end-labeled DNA with base-specific chemical cleavages.

Authors:  A M Maxam; W Gilbert
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.600

9.  Nucleotides flanking a conserved TAAT core dictate the DNA binding specificity of three murine homeodomain proteins.

Authors:  K M Catron; N Iler; C Abate
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Primary structure and developmental expression pattern of Hox 3.1, a member of the murine Hox 3 homeobox gene cluster.

Authors:  G Breier; G R Dressler; P Gruss
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  31 in total

1.  HOXA9 forms triple complexes with PBX2 and MEIS1 in myeloid cells.

Authors:  W F Shen; S Rozenfeld; A Kwong; L G Köm ves; H J Lawrence; C Largman
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Characterization of Hoxd1 protein-DNA-binding specificity using affinity chromatography and random DNA oligomer selection.

Authors:  P Kumar; A J Nazarali
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.046

3.  Role of intrinsic DNA binding specificity in defining target genes of the mammalian transcription factor PDX1.

Authors:  Arthur Liberzon; Gabriela Ridner; Michael D Walker
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-02       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  HOXC4, HOXC5, and HOXC6 expression in primary cutaneous lymphoid lesions. High expression of HOXC5 in anaplastic large-cell lymphomas.

Authors:  J J Bijl; E Rieger; J W van Oostveen; J M Walboomers; M Kreike; R Willemze; C J Meijer
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  Pbx modulation of Hox homeodomain amino-terminal arms establishes different DNA-binding specificities across the Hox locus.

Authors:  C P Chang; L Brocchieri; W F Shen; C Largman; M L Cleary
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Program specificity for Ptf1a in pancreas versus neural tube development correlates with distinct collaborating cofactors and chromatin accessibility.

Authors:  David M Meredith; Mark D Borromeo; Tye G Deering; Bradford H Casey; Trisha K Savage; Paul R Mayer; Chinh Hoang; Kuang-Chi Tung; Manonmani Kumar; Chengcheng Shen; Galvin H Swift; Raymond J Macdonald; Jane E Johnson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Repression by HoxA7 is mediated by the homeodomain and the modulatory action of its N-terminal-arm residues.

Authors:  C A Schnabel; C Abate-Shen
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Distinct regulatory elements control muscle-specific, fiber-type-selective, and axially graded expression of a myosin light-chain gene in transgenic mice.

Authors:  M V Rao; M J Donoghue; J P Merlie; J R Sanes
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Structural determinants within Pbx1 that mediate cooperative DNA binding with pentapeptide-containing Hox proteins: proposal for a model of a Pbx1-Hox-DNA complex.

Authors:  Q Lu; M P Kamps
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 10.  Hox genes and their candidate downstream targets in the developing central nervous system.

Authors:  Z N Akin; A J Nazarali
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.