Literature DB >> 7910231

A population study of food intolerance.

E Young1, M D Stoneham, A Petruckevitch, J Barton, R Rona.   

Abstract

We did a population study to identify the prevalence of reactions to eight foods commonly perceived to cause sensitivity in the UK. A cross-sectional survey of 7500 households in the Wycombe Health Authority area and the same number of randomly-selected households nationwide was followed up by interviews of positive respondents from the Wycombe Health Authority area. Those who agreed entered a double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge study to confirm food intolerance. 20.4% of the nationwide sample and 19.9% of the High Wycombe sample complained of food intolerance. Of the 93 subjects who entered the double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge, 19.4% (95% confidence interval 11.4%-27.4%) had a positive reaction. The estimated prevalence of reactions to the eight foods tested in the population varied from 1.4% to 1.8% according to the definition used. Women perceived food intolerance more frequently and showed a higher rate of positive results to food challenge. There is a discrepancy between perception of food intolerance and the results of the double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges. The consequences of mistaken perception of food intolerance may be considerable in financial, nutritional, and health terms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7910231     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90234-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  90 in total

Review 1.  The gut as target organ for oral immunovaccination with allergen DNA: new hope for patients with anaphylactic reactions to food?

Authors:  S C Bischoff
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Allergic emergencies in the emergency room.

Authors:  F Staikowsky; C Zanker; L Casenove
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 3.  Physiological effects of starvation interpreted as food allergy.

Authors:  C A Bethune; M M Gompels; G P Spickett
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-07-31

4.  Historical misrepresentation in science: the case of fetal alcohol syndrome.

Authors:  Ivan A Shibley; Sam N Pennington
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 5.  Update on food allergy in adults.

Authors:  Rabia Quddus Chaudhry; John J Oppenheimer
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.806

6.  Chronic Functional Abdominal Pain (CFAP).

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-08

7.  Prevalence and longitudinal trends of food allergy during childhood and adolescence: Results of the Isle of Wight Birth Cohort study.

Authors:  D Venkataraman; M Erlewyn-Lajeunesse; R J Kurukulaaratchy; S Potter; G Roberts; S Matthews; S H Arshad
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 5.018

8.  Food Intolerance: Dietary Treatments in Functional Bowel Disorders.

Authors:  Maria O'Sullivan; Colm O'Morain
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-08

Review 9.  Food allergies.

Authors:  Paula F G O'Leary; Fergus Shanahan
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2002-10

10.  Irritable bowel syndrome: diagnosis and pathogenesis.

Authors:  Magdy El-Salhy
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.