Literature DB >> 7909301

Examination of DNA sequences undergoing chromatin conformation changes at a variegating breakpoint in Drosophila melanogaster.

J Locke1.   

Abstract

Position effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster is associated with the inability of certain genes to be correctly expressed in a proportion of cells, giving a mosaic phenotype. The lack of expression is thought to be due to alterations in the gene's chromatin structure due to its proximity to a region of heterochromatin. Because of the difficulties involved, there is little biochemical data to support the intuitively appealing model of 'heterochromatin spreading' used to explain this phenomenon. Differences in restriction fragment length were used to distinguish DNA regions from either normal (non-position affected) or rearranged (position affected) chromosomes so as to examine possible changes in gene copy number and the effects of endogenous nucleases. DNA sequences at the breakpoint of In(1)wm4, which variegates for the white gene, were assayed under conditions where the chromatin conformation was altered using second site modifier mutations (Su(var) or En(var)). No change in the DNA sequence copy number was observed at either chromosome breakpoint, relative to wild type, when either suppressor or enhancer mutations were present. Therefore copy number change, through differential polyploidization or somatic gene loss, is not affected by Su(var) or En(var) induced changes in the chromatin conformation. Initial experiments showed a gross difference in the sensitivity of DNA to endogenous nucleases that appeared associated with Su(var) and En(var) mutations. En(var) mutation bearing samples appeared delayed in the digestion, relative to Su(var).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7909301     DOI: 10.1007/bf00057505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  9 in total

1.  A position-effect assay for boundaries of higher order chromosomal domains.

Authors:  R Kellum; P Schedl
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-03-08       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Changed pattern of transcription and replication in polytene chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster resulting from eu-heterochromatin rearrangement.

Authors:  E V Ananiev; V A Gvozdev
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1974-03-14       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Genetic duplication in the white-split interval of the X chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  G Lefevre; M M Green
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 4.  Position effect variegation in Drosophila: towards a genetics of chromatin assembly.

Authors:  J C Eissenberg
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.345

5.  Dosage-dependent modifiers of position effect variegation in Drosophila and a mass action model that explains their effect.

Authors:  J Locke; M A Kotarski; K D Tartof
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Vectors for P element-mediated gene transfer in Drosophila.

Authors:  G M Rubin; A C Spradling
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1983-09-24       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Evidence of mobilization of hobo transposons in a P-element mutagenesis screen.

Authors:  J Locke; S Hanna; D Kong
Journal:  Genome       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.166

8.  Reduced DNA polytenization of a minichromosome region undergoing position-effect variegation in Drosophila.

Authors:  G H Karpen; A C Spradling
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-10-05       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Sixty years of mystery.

Authors:  A C Spradling; G H Karpen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.562

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Epigenetic silencing of a foreign gene in nuclear transformants of Chlamydomonas.

Authors:  H Cerutti; A M Johnson; N W Gillham; J E Boynton
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  Introduction of a DNA methyltransferase into Drosophila to probe chromatin structure in vivo.

Authors:  D R Wines; P B Talbert; D V Clark; S Henikoff
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Probes of chromatin accessibility in the Drosophila bithorax complex respond differently to Polycomb-mediated repression.

Authors:  K McCall; W Bender
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-02-01       Impact factor: 11.598

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.