Literature DB >> 7904666

Outcome prediction in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia by molecular quantification of residual disease at the end of induction.

M J Brisco1, J Condon, E Hughes, S H Neoh, P J Sykes, R Seshadri, I Toogood, K Waters, G Tauro, H Ekert.   

Abstract

Methods to detect and quantify minimal residual disease (MRD) after chemotherapy for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) could improve treatment by identifying patients who need more or less intensive therapy. We have used a clone-specific polymerase chain reaction to detect rearranged immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene from the leukaemic clone, and quantified the clone by limiting dilution analysis. MRD was successfully quantified, by extracting DNA from marrow slides, from 88 of 181 children with ALL, who had total leucocyte counts below 100 x 10(9)/L at presentation and were enrolled in two clinical trials, in 1980-84 and 1985-89. Leukaemia was detected in the first remission marrow of 38 patients, in amounts between 6.7 x 10(-2) and 9.9 x 10(-7) cells; 26 of these patients relapsed. Of 50 patients with no MRD detected, despite study of 522-496,000 genomes, only 6 relapsed. The association between MRD detection and outcome was significant for patients in each trial. In the first trial, patients relapsed at all levels of detected MRD, whereas in the later trial, in which treatment was more intensive and results were better, the extent of MRD was closely related to the probability of relapse (5 of 5 patients with > 10(-3) MRD, 4 of 10 with 10(-3) to 2 x 10(-5), 0 of 3 with levels below 2 x 10(-5), and 2 of 26 with no MRD detected). Early quantification of leukaemic cells after chemotherapy may be a successful strategy for predicting outcome and hence individualizing treatment in childhood ALL, because the results indicate both in-vivo drug sensitivity of the leukaemia and the number of leukaemic cells that remain to be killed by post-induction therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7904666     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90988-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  34 in total

1.  The study of minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Authors:  C J Knechtli; N J Goulden; K Langlands; M N Potter
Journal:  Clin Mol Pathol       Date:  1995-04

2.  Quantitative analysis of minimal residual disease predicts relapse in children with B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia in DFCI ALL Consortium Protocol 95-01.

Authors:  Jianbiao Zhou; Meredith A Goldwasser; Aihong Li; Suzanne E Dahlberg; Donna Neuberg; Hongjun Wang; Virginia Dalton; Kathryn D McBride; Stephen E Sallan; Lewis B Silverman; John G Gribben
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Time point-dependent concordance of flow cytometry and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction for minimal residual disease detection in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gaipa; Giovanni Cazzaniga; Maria Grazia Valsecchi; Renate Panzer-Grümayer; Barbara Buldini; Daniela Silvestri; Leonid Karawajew; Oscar Maglia; Richard Ratei; Alessandra Benetello; Simona Sala; Angela Schumich; Andre Schrauder; Tiziana Villa; Marinella Veltroni; Wolf-Dieter Ludwig; Valentino Conter; Martin Schrappe; Andrea Biondi; Michael N Dworzak; Giuseppe Basso
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 4.  Biology and treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  L Levitt; R Lin
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1996-02

5.  Biologically-generated primer for PCR: PCR primer of unknown sequence.

Authors:  C Bindon; J Martindale; C Mitchell
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 6.  Should minimal residual disease monitoring in acute lymphoblastic leukemia be standard of care?

Authors:  Dario Campana
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.952

7.  Role of minimal residual disease evaluation in leukemia therapy.

Authors:  Dario Campana
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 8.  Recent advances in the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Masamitsu Yanada; Ryuzo Ohno; Tomoki Naoe
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 9.  Minimal Residual Disease Evaluation in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Clinical Evidence Review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2016-03-08

10.  Kinetics of minimal residual disease during induction/consolidation therapy in standard-risk adult B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  C Scholten; M Födinger; M Mitterbauer; K Laczika; G Mitterbauer; O A Haas; P Knöbl; I Schwarzinger; R Thalhammer; B Purtscher
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.673

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.