Literature DB >> 7900559

Evaluation of stents following septoplasty.

B Guyuron, C Vaughan.   

Abstract

This prospective study was designed to evaluate the immediate postoperative course and long-term efficacy of septal stents. In 20 patients who underwent primary septorhinoplasty, Doyle II silicone stents were inserted bilaterally parallel to the septum. The stents were removed after an average of 3.3 days. A hollow tube was designed into this particular stent in an attempt to minimize patients discomfort from nasal airway obstruction. Subjective ratings of airway improvement were very similar for patients whose septums were supported with nasal stents and for those patients from our 1989 study whose noses were treated with nasal packing. However, the number of patients who complained about discomfort was substantially higher in the stent group, 60% (12 of 20), compared with the nasal packing group, 22% (5 of 23 patients) (p < 0.05). The percentage of partial residual or recurrent septal deviation was also slightly higher in the stent group, 25% (5 of 20), than in the packing group, 13% (3 of 23 patients), but this was not statistically significant (p > 0.50). The alar base incision was partially dehisced during removal of the stent in one patient, in spite of a routine reduction in the width of the splint.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7900559     DOI: 10.1007/bf00209314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.326


  10 in total

1.  Maintenance of the post-operative nasal airway.

Authors:  A F WALLACE
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  1962-07

2.  Postrhinoplastic intranasal adhesions.

Authors:  S COHEN
Journal:  AMA Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1951-12

3.  The postoperative nasal dressing. A new intranasal splint.

Authors:  M Bernal-Sprekelsen
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.681

4.  Role of the septum in rhinoplasty.

Authors:  J W MALINIAC
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1948-08

5.  Is packing after septorhinoplasty necessary? A randomized study.

Authors:  B Guyuron
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  The role of intranasal splints in the prevention of post-operative nasal adhesions.

Authors:  J B Campbell; M G Watson; P M Shenoi
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 1.469

7.  Surgery of the nasal septum and pyramid.

Authors:  A G Gilchrist
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 1.469

8.  [A report of two fatal aspirations of nasal packings (author's transl)].

Authors:  D Spillman
Journal:  Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg)       Date:  1981-02

9.  Intranasal splints and their effects on intranasal adhesions and septal stability.

Authors:  J A Cook; N J Murrant; K L Evans; R J Lavelle
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1992-02

10.  Toxic shock syndrome following septoplasty using plastic septal splints.

Authors:  R Wagner; J M Toback
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.325

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  A new modification of Doyle splint (Hemi-split Doyle) in rhinoplasty with alar base reduction.

Authors:  İlker Koçak; E Şentürk
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Restorative procedures in disturbed function of the upper airways - nasal breathing.

Authors:  Gunter Mlynski
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-10-17

3.  Doyle silicone splint insertion: endoscopy-assisted versus nasal speculum assisted.

Authors:  Secil Bahar Dal
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-08-19
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.