Literature DB >> 7899978

Complications after transpedicular stabilization of the spine. A survivorship analysis of 163 cases.

A Ohlin1, M Karlsson, H Düppe, R Hasserius, I Redlund-Johnell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The authors studied complications of transpedicular stabilization methods. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: One hundred and sixty-three consecutive transpedicular stabilization procedures were performed between January 1987 and December 1991. The indications for stabilization were trauma (33 cases), metastatic spinal disorder (30 cases), spinal stenosis (33 cases), spondylolisthesis (27 cases), ankylosing spondylitis (6 cases), low back pain (22 cases), and miscellaneous (12 cases).
METHODS: Patients records and the entire series of radiographs for each case were scrutinized by independent observers. All per- and postoperative complications, including implant loosening and fatigue, were recorded. Clinical and radiographic survivorship analyses of the implants were performed.
RESULTS: Early complications were unusual and none were associated with permanent morbidity. The probability of not having the implant removed in the first postoperative year was 85%. There was a 40% risk of radiographic failure, defined as loosening or implant fatigue, at 6 months. The outcome was more favorable in cases in which anterior vertebral interbody fusion was also performed.
CONCLUSIONS: Transpedicular fixation is a safe procedure with a low incidence of serious per- and early postoperative complications. The mechanical durability of transpedicular fixators used alone is a cause for concern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7899978     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199412150-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  25 in total

1.  Development and validation of a quantitative method to assess pedicle screw loosening in posterior spine instrumentation on plain radiographs.

Authors:  Emin Aghayev; Nicolas Zullig; Peter Diel; Daniel Dietrich; Lorin M Benneker
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Bioresorbable polymers: heading for a new generation of spinal cages.

Authors:  P I J M Wuisman; T H Smit
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Early complications of spinal pedicle screw.

Authors:  A A Faraj; J K Webb
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Experimental validation of adaptive pedicle screws-a novel implant concept using shape memory alloys.

Authors:  Michael Werner; Niels Hammer; Christian Rotsch; Isabell Berthold; Mario Leimert
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Biomechanical and histological evaluation of an expandable pedicle screw in osteoporotic spine in sheep.

Authors:  Shiyong Wan; Wei Lei; Zixiang Wu; Da Liu; Mingxuan Gao; Suochao Fu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Insertion torque is not a good predictor of pedicle screw loosening after spinal instrumentation: a prospective study in 8 patients.

Authors:  Bengt Sandén; Claes Olerud; Sune Larsson; Yohan Robinson
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2010-09-03

7.  Inter-observer reliability of detecting Dynesys pedicle screw using plain X-rays: a study on 50 post-operative patients.

Authors:  Fras Dakhil-Jerew; H Jadeja; A Cohen; J A N Shepperd
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Influence of the screw augmentation technique and a diameter increase on pedicle screw fixation in the osteoporotic spine: pullout versus fatigue testing.

Authors:  Rebecca A Kueny; Jan P Kolb; Wolfgang Lehmann; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Gerd Huber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Time-dependent failure in load-bearing polymers: a potential hazard in structural applications of polylactides.

Authors:  T H Smit; T A P Engels; S H M Söntjens; L E Govaert
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-11-07       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Comparison and prediction of pullout strength of conical and cylindrical pedicle screws within synthetic bone.

Authors:  Wen-Chi Tsai; Po-Quang Chen; Tung-Wu Lu; Shing-Sheng Wu; Kao-Shang Shih; Shang-Chih Lin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.