OBJECTIVE: To compare sexual function in women with and without uterovaginal prolapse and urinary incontinence. METHODS: Eighty women with prolapse and with or without incontinence and 30 continent women without prolapse completed questionnaires assessing sexual function and underwent a physical examination. RESULTS: Women with prolapse were older than those without prolapse (mean age +/- standard deviation 58.2 +/- 13.0 versus 49.2 +/- 8.4 years, respectively; P < .001). The proportions of sexually active women were similar in both groups (56 and 57% for those with and those without prolapse, respectively). Measures of sexual function were not significantly different between the two groups. The mean global sexual function score was 0.58 +/- 0.15 in the prolapse group and 0.55 +/- 0.14 in the comparison group, a nonsignificant difference. The proportion of women with vaginal dryness or dyspareunia did not differ significantly between the two groups. Interest in sexual activity was unchanged in 70% of sexually active women with prolapse and incontinence, and 84% reported satisfaction with their sexual relationship. Twenty of 45 (44%) sexually active women with prolapse reported incontinence during sexual activity, and 14 (31%) reported that incontinence or prolapse interfered with sexual activity. After multivariate analysis, increasing age was the only significant factor predictive of a higher global sexual function score (P = .02), indicating worse sexual function. Increasing grade of prolapse predicted interference with sexual activity (P = .05), although this did not affect frequency of intercourse or description of satisfaction with the sexual relationship. CONCLUSION: Women with prolapse and urinary incontinence do not differ from continent women without prolapse in measures of sexual function; age is the most important predictor of sexual function.
OBJECTIVE: To compare sexual function in women with and without uterovaginal prolapse and urinary incontinence. METHODS: Eighty women with prolapse and with or without incontinence and 30 continent women without prolapse completed questionnaires assessing sexual function and underwent a physical examination. RESULTS:Women with prolapse were older than those without prolapse (mean age +/- standard deviation 58.2 +/- 13.0 versus 49.2 +/- 8.4 years, respectively; P < .001). The proportions of sexually active women were similar in both groups (56 and 57% for those with and those without prolapse, respectively). Measures of sexual function were not significantly different between the two groups. The mean global sexual function score was 0.58 +/- 0.15 in the prolapse group and 0.55 +/- 0.14 in the comparison group, a nonsignificant difference. The proportion of women with vaginal dryness or dyspareunia did not differ significantly between the two groups. Interest in sexual activity was unchanged in 70% of sexually active women with prolapse and incontinence, and 84% reported satisfaction with their sexual relationship. Twenty of 45 (44%) sexually active women with prolapse reported incontinence during sexual activity, and 14 (31%) reported that incontinence or prolapse interfered with sexual activity. After multivariate analysis, increasing age was the only significant factor predictive of a higher global sexual function score (P = .02), indicating worse sexual function. Increasing grade of prolapse predicted interference with sexual activity (P = .05), although this did not affect frequency of intercourse or description of satisfaction with the sexual relationship. CONCLUSION:Women with prolapse and urinary incontinence do not differ from continent women without prolapse in measures of sexual function; age is the most important predictor of sexual function.
Authors: Daniel Altman; Annika López; Catharina Gustafsson; Christian Falconer; Johan Nordenstam; Jan Zetterström Journal: Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct Date: 2005-04-05
Authors: Victoria L Handa; Halina M Zyczynski; Linda Brubaker; Ingrid Nygaard; Nancy K Janz; Holly E Richter; Patricia A Wren; Morton B Brown; Anne M Weber Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Megan O Schimpf; Heidi S Harvie; Tola B Omotosho; Lee B Epstein; Marjorie Jean-Michel; Cedric K Olivera; Kristin E Rooney; Sunil Balgobin; Okechukwu A Ibeanu; Rajiv B Gala; Rebecca G Rogers Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2009-12-04 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Linda Brubaker; Seine Chiang; Halina Zyczynski; Peggy Norton; D Lynn Kalinoski; Anne Stoddard; John W Kusek; William Steers Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2009-03-16 Impact factor: 8.661