BACKGROUND: Pelvic floor symptoms are common and are negatively associated with sexual function which, in turn, is an important aspect of quality of life. The majority of older women with pelvic floor symptoms are treated in general practice but evidence from studies in general practice on the sexual functioning of these women is scarce. AIM: This study examined predictors of sexual inactivity in older women with pelvic floor symptoms in general practice and of sexual functioning in those women who are sexually active. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study in women (aged ≥55 years) from 20 general practices who screened positive on a pelvic floor symptom questionnaire. METHOD: Logistic and linear regression analyses were used to determine predictors of sexual inactivity and sexual functioning (PISQ-12) by assessing their association with patient characteristics, symptoms (PFDI-20) and degree of prolapse (POP-Q). RESULTS: A total of 639 women were included (sexually active n = 393, sexually inactive n = 246). Predictors of sexual inactivity were increasing age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.10 to 1.17) and lower education (OR = 2.31; 95% CI = 1.50 to 3.54; Nagelkerke R(2) = 0.208). In sexually active women, sexual functioning was associated with pelvic floor symptom distress (P<0.001) and pelvic floor surgery (P = 0.018; R(2) = 0.138). CONCLUSION: In older women with pelvic floor symptoms, increasing age and lower educational level are predictors of sexual inactivity. Many of these older women are sexually active and pelvic floor symptom distress is negatively associated with sexual functioning. These results may encourage GPs to ask about sexual problems in women with pelvic floor symptoms.
BACKGROUND: Pelvic floor symptoms are common and are negatively associated with sexual function which, in turn, is an important aspect of quality of life. The majority of older women with pelvic floor symptoms are treated in general practice but evidence from studies in general practice on the sexual functioning of these women is scarce. AIM: This study examined predictors of sexual inactivity in older women with pelvic floor symptoms in general practice and of sexual functioning in those women who are sexually active. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study in women (aged ≥55 years) from 20 general practices who screened positive on a pelvic floor symptom questionnaire. METHOD: Logistic and linear regression analyses were used to determine predictors of sexual inactivity and sexual functioning (PISQ-12) by assessing their association with patient characteristics, symptoms (PFDI-20) and degree of prolapse (POP-Q). RESULTS: A total of 639 women were included (sexually active n = 393, sexually inactive n = 246). Predictors of sexual inactivity were increasing age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.10 to 1.17) and lower education (OR = 2.31; 95% CI = 1.50 to 3.54; Nagelkerke R(2) = 0.208). In sexually active women, sexual functioning was associated with pelvic floor symptom distress (P<0.001) and pelvic floor surgery (P = 0.018; R(2) = 0.138). CONCLUSION: In older women with pelvic floor symptoms, increasing age and lower educational level are predictors of sexual inactivity. Many of these older women are sexually active and pelvic floor symptom distress is negatively associated with sexual functioning. These results may encourage GPs to ask about sexual problems in women with pelvic floor symptoms.
Entities:
Keywords:
general practice; pelvic floor disorders; pelvic organ prolapse; postmenopause; psychological; sexual activity; sexual dysfunctions
Authors: Guri Rortveit; Leslee L Subak; David H Thom; Jennifer M Creasman; Eric Vittinghoff; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Jeanette S Brown Journal: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 2.091
Authors: Ilana B Addis; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Christina L Wassel-Fyr; Eric Vittinghoff; Jeanette S Brown; David H Thom Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Gianluca Pellino; Lisa Ramage; Constantinos Simillis; Oliver Warren; Christos Kontovounisios; Emile Tan; Paris Tekkis Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2017-03-15 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Priyanka Gupta; James Payne; Kim A Killinger; Michael Ehlert; Jamie Bartley; Jason Gilleran; Judy A Boura; Larry T Sirls Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2016-06-24 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Lisette A 't Hoen; Elaine Utomo; Anneke B Steensma; Bertil F M Blok; Ida J Korfage Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2015-05-12 Impact factor: 2.894