Literature DB >> 7897780

Acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry, and the sensation of nasal patency: a correlative study.

R Roithmann1, P Cole, J Chapnik, S M Barreto, J P Szalai, N Zamel.   

Abstract

Acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry were used to evaluate the relationship between nasal cross-sectional areas, nasal resistances, and sensations of nasal patency. These parameters were measured before and after topical application of a nasal decongestant in 78 patients suffering from nasal obstruction. As subjects breathed voluntarily through both nasal cavities, no significant correlation was found between sensation of nasal patency and combined nasal minimum cross-sectional areas (r = .11) or of total airflow resistance (r = -.11) either before or after decongestion. However, when subjects were required to breathe through each nasal cavity separately, a significant correlation was found between ipsilateral sensation of nasal patency and both ipsilateral minimum cross-sectional area pre-decongestion (r = -.53, p < .0001) and post-decongestion (r = -.22, p < .01), and airflow resistance pre-decongestion (r = .42, p < .0001) and post-decongestion (r = .25, p < .01). A significant, negative, nonlinear relationship was also found between nasal minimum cross-sectional area and nasal resistance. Furthermore, acoustic rhinometry demonstrated that small intrusions into the lumen of the nose that might be missed by rhinoscopy produce an exponentially greater increase in nasal resistance measurements by rhinomanometry. The findings were most striking in the valve region. It is concluded that each of these objective and complementary measurement techniques provides a more reliable assessment of nasal patency than subjective evaluation by either patient or clinician and can thus provide valuable guidance in management of the symptom of nasal obstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7897780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0381-6605


  30 in total

1.  Nasal patency is related to dust exposure in woodworkers.

Authors:  V Schlünssen; I Schaumburg; N T Andersen; T Sigsgaard; O F Pedersen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Sensation of nasal patency compared to rhinomanometric results after septoplasty.

Authors:  Tamás Tompos; Tibor Garai; Béla Zemplén; Imre Gerlinger
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Computed nasal resistance compared with patient-reported symptoms in surgically treated nasal airway passages: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Julia S Kimbell; Guilherme J M Garcia; Dennis O Frank; Daniel E Cannon; Sachin S Pawar; John S Rhee
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.467

4.  Nasal obstruction following septorhinoplasty: how well does acoustic rhinometry work?

Authors:  Deniz Tuna Edizer; Ferhat Erisir; Yalcin Alimoglu; Seher Gokce
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Modified autospreader flap for nasal valve support: utilizing the spring effect of the upper lateral cartilage.

Authors:  Wael Khamis Hussein; Samy Elwany; Motaz Montaser
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Subjective, anatomical, and functional nasal evaluation of patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

Authors:  Tatiana de Aguiar Vidigal; Fernanda Louise Martinho Haddad; Luiz Carlos Gregório; Dalva Poyares; Sérgio Tufik; Lia Rita Azeredo Bittencourt
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 2.816

7.  Awake measures of nasal resistance and upper airway resistance on CPAP during sleep.

Authors:  Maria J Masdeu; Vijay Seelall; Amit V Patel; Indu Ayappa; David M Rapoport
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 4.062

8.  The nasal airways response in normal subjects to oxymetazoline spray: randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  L Bickford; S Shakib; D Taverner
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  A validation study of nasal spectroscopy: Rhinolux.

Authors:  Johan Hellgren; Connie Katelaris; Janet Rimmer
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-04-24       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Objective measurement of nasal airway dimensions and resistance using acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry in habitual snorers compared with non-snorers.

Authors:  Shahriar Yahyavi; Faezeh Mahdavi Parsa; Seyed-Mohammad Fereshtehnejad; Neda Najimi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.