Literature DB >> 25266940

Modified autospreader flap for nasal valve support: utilizing the spring effect of the upper lateral cartilage.

Wael Khamis Hussein1, Samy Elwany, Motaz Montaser.   

Abstract

Nasal valve dysfunction has a role in up to 13% of adults complaining of chronic nasal obstruction yet it is overlooked by many physicians. In rhinoplasty and other nasal surgeries, preserving nasal function is the most significant issue. The autospreader flap has proved to be an effective spreader graft alternative. Adding the spring effect proposed in this study to the autospreader flap increases the width of the internal nasal valve, thus gaining two factors supporting the internal nasal valve. The modified autospreader flap technique is described in detail. Patients in this study were classified into two groups. The first group had no obstructive complaints and the second group had nasal obstructive complaints. Quantitative analysis of NOSE scale scores, endoscopic evaluation, and tomographic evaluation before and after the surgery were performed using statistical analysis. Survey responses were received from 22 patients. Significant improvement in the nasal valve angle width was found in both groups by the endoscopic and tomographic evaluation. Subjective evaluation using NOSE scale scores showed improvement in both groups. The greatest advantage of this technique is that it adds to the autospreader flap a spring action that widens the valve area. We found this technique to be reliable and simple to be performed with fairly good results and patient satisfaction. Level of evidence V Evidence from systematic reviews of descriptive and qualitative studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25266940     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-014-3309-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  12 in total

1.  Computed tomography technique for evaluation of the nasal valve.

Authors:  David M Poetker; John S Rhee; Burce O Mocan; Michelle A Michel
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug

2.  Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale.

Authors:  Michael G Stewart; David L Witsell; Timothy L Smith; Edward M Weaver; Bevan Yueh; Maureen T Hannley
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Internal nasal valve: revisited with objective facts.

Authors:  Murat Cem Miman; Hacim Deliktaş; Orhan Ozturan; Yüksel Toplu; Mustafa Akarçay
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  Obstruction of the nasal valve.

Authors:  S Elwany; H Thabet
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.469

5.  The autospreader flap in reduction rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Jon-Paul Pepper; Shan R Baker
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2011 May-Jun

6.  Effects of rhinoplasty on the internal nasal valve: a comparison between internal continuous and external perforating osteotomy.

Authors:  Mohammad Z Helal; Mahmoud El-Tarabishi; Sabry Magdy Sabry; Aya Yassin; Amr Rabie; Samuel J Lin
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.539

7.  Nasal airway preservation using the autospreader technique: analysis of outcomes using a disease-specific quality-of-life instrument.

Authors:  Sirius Yoo; Sam P Most
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2011-02-21

8.  Endonasal spreader graft placement as treatment for internal nasal valve insufficiency: no need to divide the upper lateral cartilages from the septum.

Authors:  Robert F André; Santdeep H Paun; Hadé D Vuyk
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb

9.  Acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry, and the sensation of nasal patency: a correlative study.

Authors:  R Roithmann; P Cole; J Chapnik; S M Barreto; J P Szalai; N Zamel
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  1994-12

10.  Development of a severity classification system for subjective nasal obstruction.

Authors:  Michael J Lipan; Sam P Most
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.611

View more
  3 in total

1.  Letter to the Editor regarding article by Hussein et al. doi:10.1007/s00405-014-3309-7.

Authors:  Sabri Baki Eren; Selahattin Tugrul; Berke Ozucer; Aysenur Meric; Orhan Ozturan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  The Safety and Efficacy of Spreader Grafts and Autospreaders in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cibele Madsen Buba; Priyesh N Patel; Mikhail Saltychev; Cherian K Kandathil; Sam P Most
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.708

3.  Comparison of Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes of Spreader Graft and Autospreader Flap in Rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Seyed Esmail Hassanpour; Ataollah Heidari; Seyed Mehdi Moosavizadeh; Mohammad Reza Tarahomi; Ali Goljanian; Sanaz Tavakoli
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2016-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.