Literature DB >> 21097490

The primary visual cortex, and feedback to it, are not necessary for conscious vision.

Dominic H Ffytche1, Semir Zeki.   

Abstract

A compelling single case report of visual awareness (visual qualia) without primary visual cortex would be sufficient to refute the hypothesis that the primary visual cortex and the back-projections to it are necessary for conscious visual experience. In a previous study, we emphasized the presence of crude visual awareness in Patient G.Y., with a lesion of the primary visual cortex, who is aware of, and able to discriminate, fast-moving visual stimuli presented to his blind field. The visual nature of Patient G.Y.'s blind field experience has since been questioned and it has been suggested that the special circumstances of repeated testing over decades may have altered Patient G.Y.'s visual pathways. We therefore sought new evidence of visual awareness without primary visual cortex in patients for whom such considerations do not apply. Three patients with hemianopic field defects (Patient G.N. and Patient F.B. with MRI confirmed primary visual cortex lesions, Patient C.G. with an inferred lesion) underwent detailed psychophysical testing in their blind fields. Visual stimuli were presented at different velocities and contrasts in two- and four-direction discrimination experiments and the direction of motion and awareness reported using a forced-choice paradigm. Detailed verbal reports were also obtained of the nature of the blind field experience with comparison of the drawings of the stimulus presented in the blind and intact fields, where possible. All three patients reported visual awareness in their blind fields. Visual awareness was significantly more likely when a moving stimulus was present compared to no stimulus catch trials (P < 0.01 for each subject). Psychophysical performance in Patient F.B. and Patient G.N. was consistent with the Riddoch syndrome, with higher levels of visual awareness for moving compared to static stimuli (P < 0.001) and intact direction discrimination (P < 0.0001 for two- and four-direction experiments). Although the blind field experience of all three subjects was degraded, it was clearly visual in nature. We conclude that the primary visual cortex or back-projections to it are not necessary for visual awareness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21097490      PMCID: PMC3159156          DOI: 10.1093/brain/awq305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  42 in total

1.  Motion discrimination in cortically blind patients.

Authors:  P Azzopardi; A Cowey
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Blindsight: the role of feedforward and feedback corticocortical connections.

Authors:  V A Lamme
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2001-04

3.  The Organization of Connections between Areas V5 and V1 in Macaque Monkey Visual Cortex.

Authors:  S Shipp; S Zeki
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Bypassing V1: a direct geniculate input to area MT.

Authors:  Lawrence C Sincich; Ken F Park; Melville J Wohlgemuth; Jonathan C Horton
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-19       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Unconscious vision: new insights into the neuronal correlate of blindsight using diffusion tractography.

Authors:  Sandra E Leh; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Alain Ptito
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  DISTURBANCES OF VISION BY CEREBRAL LESIONS.

Authors:  G Holmes
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1918-07       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Visual perception of motion, luminance and colour in a human hemianope.

Authors:  A B Morland; S R Jones; A L Finlay; E Deyzac; S Lê; S Kemp
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Conscious visual perception without V1.

Authors:  J L Barbur; J D Watson; R S Frackowiak; S Zeki
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Blindsight depends on the lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  Michael C Schmid; Sylwia W Mrowka; Janita Turchi; Richard C Saunders; Melanie Wilke; Andrew J Peters; Frank Q Ye; David A Leopold
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Neural activity within area V1 reflects unconscious visual performance in a case of blindsight.

Authors:  Petya D Radoeva; Sashank Prasad; David H Brainard; Geoffrey K Aguirre
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  19 in total

1.  Are hemianopic monkeys and a human hemianope aware of visual events in the blind field?

Authors:  Alan Cowey; Iona Alexander
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Neural correlates of visual motion processing without awareness in patients with striate cortex and pulvinar lesions.

Authors:  Maria Barleben; Christian M Stoppel; Jörn Kaufmann; Christian Merkel; Thoralf Wecke; Michael Goertler; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Jens-Max Hopf; Mircea A Schoenfeld
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Primary visual cortex: awareness and blindsight.

Authors:  David A Leopold
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 12.449

4.  Towards an integrative theory of consciousness: part 2 (an anthology of various other models).

Authors:  Avinash De Sousa
Journal:  Mens Sana Monogr       Date:  2013-01

5.  What brain plasticity reveals about the nature of consciousness: commentary.

Authors:  Chris D Frith
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-05-11

6.  Consciousness and the prefrontal parietal network: insights from attention, working memory, and chunking.

Authors:  Daniel Bor; Anil K Seth
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-03-12

Review 7.  Visualizing the blind brain: brain imaging of visual field defects from early recovery to rehabilitation techniques.

Authors:  Marika Urbanski; Olivier A Coubard; Clémence Bourlon
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-30

Review 8.  A massively asynchronous, parallel brain.

Authors:  Semir Zeki
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Emotional processing of personally familiar faces in the vegetative state.

Authors:  Haggai Sharon; Yotam Pasternak; Eti Ben Simon; Michal Gruberger; Nir Giladi; Ben Zion Krimchanski; David Hassin; Talma Hendler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Perceptual asynchrony for motion.

Authors:  Yu Tung Lo; Semir Zeki
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.