Literature DB >> 7893029

Risk of catheter migration during combined spinal epidural block: percutaneous epiduroscopy study.

B Holmström1, N Rawal, K Axelsson, P A Nydahl.   

Abstract

Combined spinal epidural (CSE) block with the needle-through-needle technique has become increasingly popular during recent years. However, the risk of epidural catheter penetrating dura mater through the hole made by the spinal needle (migration) is a major concern. In 15 fresh cadavers a percutaneous epiduroscopy technique with a rigid epiduroscope and video recording was used to assess the risk of catheter migration when a CSE block is performed. The experimental sequence included (a) one dural hole made by the spinal needle, (b) multiple (five) dural holes made by the spinal needle, and (c) a dural hole made by Tuohy needle. Twenty-four experimental sequences were performed in the lumbar region. Four sequences were failures due to technical problems. In the remaining 20 cases, the anatomic structures in the epidural space were recognized easily. The epidural space appears to be only a potential space, kept open either by epiduroscope or by repeated injections of air or saline. The dural holes made by Tuohy and spinal needles, and the ease of difficulty of catheter penetration through these holes, were clearly visible. Extensive tenting of the dura was seen in all subjects. It was impossible to force an 18-gauge epidural catheter through the dural hole after a single dural puncture made by a 25-gauge spinal needle. After multiple (five) dural punctures with the spinal needle, the epidural catheter penetrated the perforated dura in 1 of 20 cases. The epidural catheter penetrated the dural hole made by the Tuohy needle in 9 of 20 cases. The distribution of fat, rather than any dorso median connective tissue band, influences the course of epidural catheter in epidural space.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7893029     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199504000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  9 in total

1.  [Structural damage of epidural catheters during combined spinal epidural anaesthesia: a lightmicroscopical study].

Authors:  B M Wahlen; M David; A Stanek
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  Labour analgesia. A risk-benefit analysis.

Authors:  R L Eberle; M C Norris
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Complications of regional anaesthesia Incidence and prevention.

Authors:  K A Faccenda; B T Finucane
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 4.  [Epidural anesthesia].

Authors:  F Gerheuser; A Roth
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Progress in analgesia for labor: focus on neuraxial blocks.

Authors:  J Sudharma Ranasinghe; David J Birnbach
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09

Review 6.  Regional anaesthesia in pre-eclampsia: advantages and disadvantages.

Authors:  Nanda Gopal Mandal; Sridhar Surapaneni
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Failed dural puncture during needle-through-needle combined spinal-epidural anesthesia: a case series.

Authors:  A Ram Doo; Yu Seob Shin; Jin-Wook Choi; Seonwoo Yoo; Sehrin Kang; Ji-Seon Son
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 3.133

8.  A Clinical Comparison between Single-Space Technique and Double-Space Technique for Combined Spinal and Epidural Anesthesia.

Authors:  Pyarejan Basheer; G C Brijesh; Raman Kumar; Shailesh Kumar; Priyesh Kumar; Jay Prakash
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2022-05-31

9.  Paramedian epidural with midline spinal in the same intervertebral space: An alternative technique for combined spinal and epidural anaesthesia.

Authors:  Deepti Saigal; Rama Wason
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2013-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.