Literature DB >> 7892823

Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI): baseline clinical and angiographic data.

W J Rogers1, E L Alderman, B R Chaitman, G DiSciascio, M Horan, B Lytle, M B Mock, A D Rosen, K Sutton-Tyrrell, B H Weiner.   

Abstract

This report presents baseline clinical and angiographic data from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI), a multicenter international trial assessing the relative efficacy of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) in selected patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. PTCA is commonly performed in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease, yet its long-term efficacy in comparison to CABG is unknown. From August 1988 through August 1991, 1,829 qualifying patients with multivessel disease suitable for either procedure were randomized to PTCA or CABG; sample size estimates were based on anticipated 5-year mortality. Two registry populations were also defined for follow-up: (1) 2,013 patients eligible for randomization but not randomized; and (2) 422 patients considered by angiography as unsuitable for randomization. Patients randomized in BARI were at relatively high risk for subsequent cardiac events: 39% were > or = 65 years old, 55% had prior myocardial infarction, 69% presented with unstable angina or non-Q wave myocardial infarction, and 43% had 3-vessel coronary artery disease. Patients randomized to PTCA and CABG were equally matched in all the important baseline variables. The randomized and the eligible but not randomized groups were similar in most respects. However, the nonrandomized group had a higher proportion with college education; fewer with a history of myocardial infarction, heart failure, diabetes, and smoking; and a somewhat better average ejection fraction. At the 3-month follow-up, PTCA had been performed more commonly in the nonrandomized eligible patients, especially those with 2-vessel disease.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7892823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

Review 1.  [Comparison between PTCA and bypass operation. Results of large randomized studies].

Authors:  N Dagres; R Erbel
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1998-01-15

Review 2.  Data standards for acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention: the European Unified Registries for Heart Care Evaluation and Randomised Trials (EuroHeart).

Authors:  Gorav Batra; Suleman Aktaa; Lars Wallentin; Aldo P Maggioni; Peter Ludman; David Erlinge; Barbara Casadei; Chris P Gale
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 35.855

Review 3.  Outcomes of patients who participate in randomized controlled trials compared to similar patients receiving similar interventions who do not participate.

Authors:  Gunn Elisabeth Vist; Dianne Bryant; Lyndsay Somerville; Trevor Birminghem; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-07-16

Review 4.  The evolution of cardiovascular surgery in elderly patient: a review of current options and outcomes.

Authors:  Francesco Nicolini; Andrea Agostinelli; Antonella Vezzani; Tullio Manca; Filippo Benassi; Alberto Molardi; Tiziano Gherli
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 3.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.