Literature DB >> 7889965

Prospective randomised comparison of single-dose versus multiple-dose cefuroxime for prophylaxis in coronary artery bypass grafting.

S M Nooyen1, B P Overbeek, A Brutel de la Rivière, A J Storm, J J Langemeyer.   

Abstract

To assess the efficacy of single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in coronary artery bypass grafting, 1,016 consecutive patients were prospectively randomized to receive either a single dose or a three-day course of cefuroxime. Nine patients (0.9%) died within seven days; no death was caused by infection. For various reasons 163 other patients were not evaluable. Therefore, 844 patients were evaluated. Patients in group A (n = 419) received 20 mg/kg cefuroxime intravenously at induction of anaesthesia; group B (n = 425) received the same dose followed by 750 mg t.i.d. for three consecutive days. Both groups were comparable regarding all risk factors. The efficacy of the prophylactic regimens was evaluated by comparison of occurrence of wound infection in both groups. No significant differences in wound infection were observed between the two treatment groups: sternal site infection in the single-dose prophylaxis group was 14% versus 13% in the three-day course group; donor site infection occurred in 38% versus 39%. It is concluded that in coronary artery bypass grafting a single dose of cefuroxime is as effective as a three-day course in the prevention of wound infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7889965     DOI: 10.1007/bf02111823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  11 in total

1.  High pressure liquid chromatographic analysis of the serum concentration of cefuroxime after an intravenous bolus injection of cefuroxime in patients with a coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  M J Koot; F N IJdenberg; R M Stuurman; J Poell; L J Bras; J J Langemeijer; L Lie-A-Huen
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1992-12-11

2.  The effective period of preventive antibiotic action in experimental incisions and dermal lesions.

Authors:  J F Burke
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  The value of prophylactic antibiotics in aorat-coronary bypass operations: a double-blind randomized trial.

Authors:  I W Fong; C B Baker; D C McKee
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988.

Authors:  J S Garner; W R Jarvis; T G Emori; T C Horan; J M Hughes
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.918

5.  Randomized comparison of cefamandole, cefazolin, and cefuroxime prophylaxis in open-heart surgery.

Authors:  T G Slama; S J Sklar; J Misinski; S W Fess
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Cephalothin prophylaxis in cardiac valve surgery. A prospective, double-blind comparison of two-day and six-day regimens.

Authors:  D A Goldmann; C C Hopkins; A W Karchmer; R M Abel; M T McEnany; C Akins; M J Buckley; R C Moellering
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Aortocoronary bypass procedures and sternotomy infections: a study of antistaphylococcal prophylaxis.

Authors:  T W Austin; J C Coles; R Burnett; M Goldbach
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Antibiotic prophylaxis in open-heart surgery patients: comparison of cefamandole and cefuroxime.

Authors:  C D Peterson; K D Lake; K V Arom; K R Love
Journal:  Drug Intell Clin Pharm       Date:  1987-09

9.  Risks of bilateral internal mammary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  N T Kouchoukos; T H Wareing; S F Murphy; C Pelate; W G Marshall
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Antibiotic prophylaxis in open-heart surgery: a comparison of cefamandole, cefuroxime, and cefazolin.

Authors:  L O Gentry; B J Zeluff; D A Cooley
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Preventing postoperative infections: current treatment recommendations.

Authors:  I C Gyssens
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Impact of the implementation of an interdisciplinary infection control program to prevent surgical wound infection in pediatric heart surgery.

Authors:  Jaume Izquierdo-Blasco; Magda Campins-Martí; Pere Soler-Palacín; Joan Balcells; Raul Abella; Ferran Gran; Félix Castillo; Rosario Nuño; Joan Sanchez-de-Toledo
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Different duration strategies of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery: an observational study.

Authors:  Khaled Hamouda; Mehmet Oezkur; Bhanu Sinha; Johannes Hain; Hannah Menkel; Marcus Leistner; Rainer Leyh; Christoph Schimmer
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 1.637

4.  Effect of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Duration on Health Care-Associated Infections After Clean Orthopedic Surgery: A Cluster Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Kosei Nagata; Koji Yamada; Tomohiro Shinozaki; Tsuyoshi Miyazaki; Fumiaki Tokimura; Yasuhito Tajiri; Takuya Matsumoto; Kiyofumi Yamakawa; Hiroyuki Oka; Akiro Higashikawa; Toshihide Sato; Kenichi Kawano; Tatsuro Karita; Takuya Koyama; Takahiro Hozumi; Hiroaki Abe; Makoto Hodohara; Kazuhiro Kohata; Masato Toyonaga; Yasushi Oshima; Sakae Tanaka; Hiroshi Okazaki
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-04-01

5.  A prospective randomised trial of isolated pathogens of surgical site infections (SSI).

Authors:  Konstantinos Alexiou; Ioannis Drikos; Maria Terzopoulou; Nikolaos Sikalias; Argyrios Ioannidis; Nikolaos Economou
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2017-07-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.