Literature DB >> 402508

Cephalothin prophylaxis in cardiac valve surgery. A prospective, double-blind comparison of two-day and six-day regimens.

D A Goldmann, C C Hopkins, A W Karchmer, R M Abel, M T McEnany, C Akins, M J Buckley, R C Moellering.   

Abstract

A prospective, double-blind study comparing a 6 day with a 2 day regimen of cephalothin prophylaxis was conducted among 200 patients undergoing prosthetic valve replacement. No cases of endocarditis occurred during the 2 month follow-up. Sternal wound infection developed in 2.8 per cent of the 6 day group and 2.1 per cent of the 2 day group. Pneumonia developed in 8.5 per cent of the 6 day and 5.3 per cent of the 2 day group; most of the bacteria isolated were susceptible to cephalothin. Urinary tract infection developed more frequently in the 2 day group (17.0 versus 8.5 per cent), particularly during the first 6 postoperative days. Three of 11 patients with no detectable cephalothin in their sera at the close of operation developed staphylococcal wound infections, compared with 2 of 175 patients whose sera contained cephalothin at the close of surgery (p = 0.002, Fisher's exact test). A short course of prophylactic antibiotics is prudent, but there is no justification for prolonging their administration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 402508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  33 in total

1.  Cefoxitin Plasma and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Concentration in Patients Undergoing Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Luigi Brunetti; Leonid Kagan; Glenn Forrester; Lauren M Aleksunes; Hongxia Lin; Steven Buyske; Ronald G Nahass
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.393

2.  Prescribing practice and cost of antibacterial prophylaxis for surgery at a US Veteran Affairs hospital.

Authors:  R A Ryono; K S Jones; R W Coleman; M Holodniy
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiovascular surgery: a prospective randomized comparative trial of cefazolin versus ceftriaxone.

Authors:  M Soteriou; F Recker; S Geroulanos; M Turina
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiothoracic surgery in the United Kingdom: current practice.

Authors:  A P Wilson; T Treasure; M F Sturridge; R N Grüneberg
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 9.139

5.  Endocarditis: the problems remain and multiply.

Authors:  H C Neu
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.553

6.  Effects of prophylactic antibiotics in vascular surgery. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study.

Authors:  P O Hasselgren; L Ivarsson; B Risberg; T Seeman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Comparison of cephalothin and cefamandole prophylaxis during insertion of prosthetic heart valves.

Authors:  G L Archer; R E Polk; R J Duma; R Lower
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Intraoperative redosing of cefazolin and risk for surgical site infection in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  G Zanetti; R Giardina; R Platt
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Efficacy of cefazolin, cefamandole, and gentamicin as prophylactic agents in cardiac surgery. Results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial in 1030 patients.

Authors:  A B Kaiser; M R Petracek; J W Lea; D S Kernodle; A C Roach; W C Alford; G R Burrus; D M Glassford; C S Thomas; W S Stoney
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Plasma and myocardial levels of cefonicid during open-heart surgery.

Authors:  R P Sterling; D J Connor; J C Norman
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 1.798

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.