Literature DB >> 7885806

Inertial acceleration as a measure of linear vection: an alternative to magnitude estimation.

T R Carpenter-Smith1, R G Futamura, D E Parker.   

Abstract

The present study focused on the development of a procedure to assess perceived self-motion induced by visual surround motion--vection. Using an apparatus that permitted independent control of visual and inertial stimuli, prone observers were translated along their head x-axis (fore/aft). The observers' task was to report the direction of self-motion during passive forward and backward translations of their bodies coupled with exposure to various visual surround conditions. The proportion of "forward" responses was used to calculate each observer's point of subjective equality (PSE) for each surround condition. The results showed that the moving visual stimulus produced a significant shift in the PSE when data from the moving surround condition were compared with the stationary surround and no-vision condition. Further, the results indicated that vection increased monotonically with surround velocities between 4 and 40 degrees/sec. It was concluded that linear vection can be measured in terms of changes in the amplitude of whole-body inertial acceleration required to elicit equivalent numbers of "forward" and "backward" self-motion reports.

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Neuroscience; NASA Discipline Number 16-10; NASA Program Space Physiology and Countermeasures; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7885806     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  22 in total

1.  The velocity response of vestibular nucleus neurons during vestibular, visual, and combined angular acceleration.

Authors:  W Waespe; V Henn
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The role of central and peripheral vision in perceiving the direction of self-motion.

Authors:  W H Warren; K J Kurtz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-05

3.  Sources of optical information useful for perception of speed of rectilinear self-motion.

Authors:  J F Larish; J M Flach
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Subjective detection of vertical acceleration: a velocity-dependent response?

Authors:  G M Jones; L R Young
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1978 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  Spatial orientation from optic flow in the central visual field.

Authors:  G J Andersen; B P Dyre
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-05

6.  Influence of visual and motion cues on manual lateral stabilization.

Authors:  J K Huang; L R Young
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1987-12

7.  Flow structure versus retinal location in the optical control of stance.

Authors:  T A Stoffregen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  A shift in the perceived simultaneity of adjacent visual stimuli following adaptation to stroboscopic motion along the same axis.

Authors:  R G Bennett; G Westheimer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Sensation of rotation about a vertical axis with a fixed visual field in different illuminations and in the dark.

Authors:  J Huang; L R Young
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Contribution of the otoliths to the calculation of linear displacement.

Authors:  I Israël; A Berthoz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  8 in total

1.  Frequency dependence of vestibuloocular reflex thresholds.

Authors:  Csilla Haburcakova; Richard F Lewis; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Vestibular labyrinth contributions to human whole-body motion discrimination.

Authors:  Yulia Valko; Richard F Lewis; Adrian J Priesol; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Signal detection theory and vestibular thresholds: I. Basic theory and practical considerations.

Authors:  Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The Oscillating Potential Model of Visually Induced Vection.

Authors:  Takeharu Seno; Ken-Ichi Sawai; Hidetoshi Kanaya; Toshihiro Wakebe; Masaki Ogawa; Yoshitaka Fujii; Stephen Palmisano
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-11-24

5.  Roll vection in migraine and controls using inertial nulling and certainty estimate techniques.

Authors:  Mark Andrew Miller; Benjamin Thomas Crane
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Perceptual Biases as the Side Effect of a Multisensory Adaptive System: Insights from Verticality and Self-Motion Perception.

Authors:  Luigi F Cuturi
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-26

7.  Human Vection Perception Using Inertial Nulling and Certainty Estimation: The Effect of Migraine History.

Authors:  Mark A Miller; Catherine J O'Leary; Paul D Allen; Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Influence of Visual Motion, Suggestion, and Illusory Motion on Self-Motion Perception in the Horizontal Plane.

Authors:  Steven David Rosenblatt; Benjamin Thomas Crane
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.