Literature DB >> 78834

Latency of luminance and contrast evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis patients.

A L Duwaer, H Spekreijse.   

Abstract

Luminance and contrast visual evoked potentials (VEPs), were studied in 18 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and 11 healthy subjects. Luminance EPs were recorded to stimulation with noise modulated light (0--60 Hz); contrast EPs were obtained to appearance-disappearance or reversal of a checkerboard pattern with various check sizes and repetition periods. Our results indicate that the apparent latency of luminance EPs to noise modulated light can hardly be used for diagnosis of MS, since the range of normal values scatters widely and greatly overlaps the range of latency values in MS patients (detection rate of 3/13). Our data confirm, on the other hand, that the latency of contrast EPs can be used to discriminate between MS patients and healthy subjects (detection rate of 12/18). We recommend for diagnostic purposes to determine the apparent latency from the phase spectrum of the responses to checkerboard reversal at repetition rates between 5 and 20 Hz, since in this frequency range the failure rate was found to be minimal. The specificity of the apparent latency data can be improved if the wave form of the transient reversal EP at a lower repetition rate (around 2 Hz) is also inspected. We suggest that an increased latency can be ascribed to several causes, only one of these being an increased conduction time due to demyelination. Indirectly this confirms that an increased EP latency is not specific for MS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 78834     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(78)90008-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  10 in total

1.  Discriminative power of visual evoked potential characteristics in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  M H Cuypers; K Dickson; A J Pinckers; J M Thijssen; O R Hommes
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Are eye movement evoked potentials different from pattern reversal evoked potentials?

Authors:  F C Riemslag; G L van der Heijde; M M van Dongen
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Pattern disappearance visually evoked cortical potential in the diseases of visual pathway.

Authors:  N Toyonaga; Y Kakisu; E Adachi
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-06-16       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Minimum procedures for visual electrodiagnostic testing.

Authors:  A C Kooijman; D van Norren; P de Sera; J M Thijssen; G L van der Heijde; D Reits; G J van der Wildt; G K Bijl
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-01-31       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Transient visually evoked potentials to sinusoidal gratings in optic neuritis.

Authors:  G T Plant
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Visual evoked cortical potentials (V.E.C.P.) by television presentation of different patterned stimuli to patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  D Gambi; P M Rossini; M Onofri; L Marchionno
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1980-03

7.  Pattern-onset visual evoked potentials in suspected multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  M J Aminoff; A L Ochs
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Leber's optic neuropathy I. Clinical studies.

Authors:  A Stehouwer; L N Went
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-09-30       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Repeatability of short-duration transient visual evoked potentials in normal subjects.

Authors:  Celso Tello; Carlos Gustavo V De Moraes; Tiago S Prata; Peter Derr; Jayson Patel; John Siegfried; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Follow-up studies in pattern VECP in demyelinating diseases in children.

Authors:  I Miyazaki; E Adachi; N Kuroda
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-06-16       Impact factor: 2.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.