Literature DB >> 7880907

Twenty-five years of progress: twenty-five more?

F Andrasik1.   

Abstract

This address outlines important steps for ensuring the future of biofeedback and applied psychophysiology. These steps are contained in the acronym PHUTRE, wherein PH stands for Political activism of the Hard and fast variety, U represents United front, T encompasses Transfer of knowledge (from clinician to researcher, researcher to clinician, and from both to students in training), R refers to our Research base, and E represents the Excitement that our field has the potential to generate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7880907     DOI: 10.1007/bf01776731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul        ISSN: 0363-3586


  6 in total

1.  A controlled study of a standardized behavioral stepped treatment for hypertension.

Authors:  M S Glasgow; B T Engel; B C D'Lugoff
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.312

2.  Growth and development of biofeedback: a bibliographic update.

Authors:  J P Hatch; I Saito
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1990-03

Review 3.  Cognitive behavioral techniques for hypertension: are they effective?

Authors:  D M Eisenberg; T L Delbanco; C S Berkey; T J Kaptchuk; B Kupelnick; J Kuhl; T C Chalmers
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-06-15       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Biobehavioral treatment of essential hypertension: a group outcome study.

Authors:  S Fahrion; P Norris; A Green; E Green; C Snarr
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1986-12

Review 5.  Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part 2, Short-term reductions in blood pressure: overview of randomised drug trials in their epidemiological context.

Authors:  R Collins; R Peto; S MacMahon; P Hebert; N H Fiebach; K A Eberlein; J Godwin; N Qizilbash; J O Taylor; C H Hennekens
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-04-07       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part 1, Prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias.

Authors:  S MacMahon; R Peto; J Cutler; R Collins; P Sorlie; J Neaton; R Abbott; J Godwin; A Dyer; J Stamler
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-03-31       Impact factor: 79.321

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.