Literature DB >> 7880459

Lack of effect of lesions in the anterior cingulate cortex and retrosplenial cortex on certain tests of spatial memory in the rat.

N Neave1, S Lloyd, A Sahgal, J P Aggleton.   

Abstract

The effects of cytotoxic lesions in either the anterior cingulate cortex or the retrosplenial cortex were compared with those of fornix lesions on three tests of spatial memory. Two of the tasks, delayed nonmatching-to-position and spatial reversal learning, were tested in an automated apparatus. The third task, forced alternation, was tested in a T-maze. Neither anterior cingulate nor retrosplenial cortex damage produced any significant impairment on the three tasks. In contrast, rats with fornix lesions (hippocampal system damage) were markedly impaired on all three tasks. The results, which were considered in the light of proposals for a hippocampal--anterior thalamic--cingulate system that is important for spatial memory, suggest that neither of the cingulate regions involved in this study form a critical subcomponent of this proposed system. It is therefore assumed that the cingulate cortices are only critical for certain classes of spatial problem. It is also suggested that in some previous studies the effects of inadvertent damage to the cingulum bundle may have contributed to the apparent effects of cingulate lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7880459     DOI: 10.1016/0166-4328(94)90077-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  16 in total

1.  Neurotoxic hippocampal lesions have no effect on odor span and little effect on odor recognition memory but produce significant impairments on spatial span, recognition, and alternation.

Authors:  P A Dudchenko; E R Wood; H Eichenbaum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Impaired spatial performance in rats with retrosplenial lesions: importance of the spatial problem and the rat strain in identifying lesion effects in a swimming pool.

Authors:  K Troy Harker; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Optogenetic inhibition of either the anterior or posterior retrosplenial cortex disrupts retrieval of a trace, but not delay, fear memory.

Authors:  Sydney Trask; Nicole C Ferrara; Kevin Grisales; Fred J Helmstetter
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 2.877

4.  Unique roles for the anterior and posterior retrosplenial cortices in encoding and retrieval of memory for context.

Authors:  Sydney Trask; Fred J Helmstetter
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 4.861

5.  Animal model of posterior cingulate cortex hypometabolism implicated in amnestic MCI and AD.

Authors:  P D Riha; J C Rojas; R A Colorado; F Gonzalez-Lima
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 2.877

6.  What does spatial alternation tell us about retrosplenial cortex function?

Authors:  Andrew J D Nelson; Anna L Powell; Joshua D Holmes; Seralynne D Vann; John P Aggleton
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.558

7.  The rat retrosplenial cortex is required when visual cues are used flexibly to determine location.

Authors:  E L Hindley; A J D Nelson; J P Aggleton; S D Vann
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The effect of retrosplenial cortex lesions in rats on incidental and active spatial learning.

Authors:  A J D Nelson; E L Hindley; J M Pearce; S D Vann; J P Aggleton
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Dysgranular retrosplenial cortex lesions in rats disrupt cross-modal object recognition.

Authors:  Emma L Hindley; Andrew J D Nelson; John P Aggleton; Seralynne D Vann
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 10.  Why do lesions in the rodent anterior thalamic nuclei cause such severe spatial deficits?

Authors:  John P Aggleton; Andrew J D Nelson
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.