Literature DB >> 7880230

Handicap one year after a stroke: validity of a new scale.

R H Harwood1, P Gompertz, S Ebrahim.   

Abstract

The aim was to determine the handicap experienced by subjects one year after a stroke, and assess the acceptability, validity, and reliability of a new handicap measurement scale. A cross sectional survey of 141 survivors of a cohort of consecutive hospital admissions with acute stroke was undertaken. The London handicap scale (a new health outcome measurement scale), Barthel index, Nottingham extended activities of daily living scale, Nottingham health profile, Geriatric depression score, and a global life satisfaction scale were used. 94 subjects (67%) responded to a single mailing; 89 (95%) responses were usable. Mean handicap was 0.40 (range 0.06-1.0, SD 0.20) on a scale of 0 (maximum handicap) to 1 (no handicap). All handicap dimensions showed a wide range of problems, with physical independence and occupation particularly affected. Correlations between handicap score and other outcome measures were all in the expected direction and of about the strength expected (0.36 < r < 0.69). The reliability coefficient was 0.91, limits of agreement +/- 0.19. The measurements demonstrated substantial handicap one year after a stroke, reflecting considerable unmet rehabilitation needs. The scale proved acceptable to subjects, and the results were consistent with good validity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7880230      PMCID: PMC1073023          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.57.7.825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  6 in total

1.  FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX.

Authors:  F I MAHONEY; D W BARTHEL
Journal:  Md State Med J       Date:  1965-02

2.  Geriatric Depression Scale.

Authors:  J A Yesavage
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  1988

Review 3.  Outcome measurement in stroke rehabilitation research.

Authors:  C Seale; P Davies
Journal:  Int Disabil Stud       Date:  1987

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Importance of sensitivity to change as a criterion for selecting health status measures.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick; S Ziebland; C Jenkinson; A Mowat; A Mowat
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1992-06

6.  Predicting the outcome of acute stroke: a prognostic score.

Authors:  C M Allen
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 10.154

  6 in total
  20 in total

Review 1.  Health status assessment of the elderly.

Authors:  I Turpie; D Strang; P Darzins; G Guyatt
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Initial validation of the Swedish version of the London Handicap Scale.

Authors:  Albert Westergren; Peter Hagell
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF).

Authors:  Alarcos Cieza; Gerold Stucki
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Quality of life of individuals born preterm: a systematic review of assessment approaches.

Authors:  Martina Estevam Brom Vieira; Maria Beatriz Martins Linhares
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Values for function in rheumatoid arthritis: patients, professionals, and public.

Authors:  S Hewlett; A P Smith; J R Kirwan
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Validity of the London handicap scale.

Authors:  A Goonetilleke
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 7.  Therapy-based rehabilitation services for stroke patients at home.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003

8.  Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?

Authors:  C A McHorney; A R Tarlov
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Measuring the ICF components of impairment, activity limitation and participation restriction: an item analysis using classical test theory and item response theory.

Authors:  Beth Pollard; Diane Dixon; Paul Dieppe; Marie Johnston
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  The FLASSH study: protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating falls prevention after stroke and two sub-studies.

Authors:  Frances A Batchelor; Keith D Hill; Shylie F Mackintosh; Catherine M Said; Craig H Whitehead
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 2.474

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.