Literature DB >> 7876726

Alteration of maximum anal resting pressure by digital rectal examination prior to manometry: analysis of agreement between repeat measurements.

F Herbst1, B Teleky.   

Abstract

To study whether digital examination preceding anal manometry causes significant alteration of maximum resting pressure reading and to quantify the discrepancies, 78 individuals (64 incontinent, 14 controls) were investigated. Recordings of maximum resting pressure were taken before and after digital rectal examination. There was a mean discrepancy of only -1.8 cms H2O between the readings and excellent correlation, but analysis of agreement revealed a bias that tended to be greater with smaller measurements and unacceptable variability between test results. Furthermore, the bias was not related to age, gender, the grade of incontinence, maximum voluntary contraction, functional anal canal length and threshold volume. Digital rectal examination prior to manometry causes unpredictable results especially in patients with lower maximum resting pressures and should strictly be avoided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7876726     DOI: 10.1007/bf00292252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  4 in total

1.  Anorectal function in normal human subjects: effect of gender.

Authors:  W M Sun; N W Read
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  An analysis of anal sphincter pressure and anal compliance in normal subjects.

Authors:  C P Gibbons; J J Bannister; E A Trowbridge; N W Read
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Effect of age, gender, and parity on anal canal pressures. Contribution of impaired anal sphincter function to fecal incontinence.

Authors:  S M McHugh; N E Diamant
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 3.199

  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  Predicting anal sphincter defects: the value of clinical examination and manometry.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Roos; Zeelha Abdool; Ranee Thakar; Abdul H Sultan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Anal inspection and digital rectal examination compared to anorectal physiology tests and endoanal ultrasonography in evaluating fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Annette C Dobben; Maaike P Terra; Marije Deutekom; Michael F Gerhards; A Bart Bijnen; Richelle J F Felt-Bersma; Lucas W M Janssen; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 2.796

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.