Literature DB >> 7875281

Protocols for in vivo measurement of the ion transport defects in cystic fibrosis nasal epithelium.

P G Middleton1, D M Geddes, E W Alton.   

Abstract

New treatments for cystic fibrosis (CF), including gene therapy, are currently being assessed. These aim to correct the basic defects of increased sodium absorption and decreased chloride secretion in airway epithelia. Assessment of these bioelectric parameters, particularly in the nasal epithelium, is likely to be used as a measure of treatment efficacy. However, the optimal in vivo protocol to discriminate cystic fibrosis from non-cystic fibrosis subjects is unclear. We have, therefore, compared three protocols for measurement of the cystic fibrosis ion transport defects in vivo in the nasal epithelium. Sodium absorption was measured using both the baseline potential difference and the response to the sodium channel blocker, amiloride. Chloride secretion was assessed in the presence of amiloride, using perfusion with isoprenaline, or terbutaline, or a low chloride solution followed by isoprenaline. Baseline potential difference (PD) and the absolute response to amiloride clearly differentiated the increased sodium absorption in the cystic fibrosis subjects. The responses both to terbutaline (delta PD: non-CF: -0.8 (SEM 0.7) mV; CF: -3.6 (0.5) mV) and isoprenaline (non-CF: 1.5 (0.6) mV; CF: -2.9 (0.6) mV) differentiated the two groups of subjects, but there was considerable overlap of values. Perfusion with a low chloride solution (non-CF: 12.6 (1.2) mV; CF: 0.6 (0.4) mV), as well as subsequent perfusion with isoprenaline (non-CF: 10.0 (1.1) mV; CF: -1.4 (0.4) mV) allowed clear separation of the two groups, with no overlap of values. Some CF subjects showed a transient hyperpolarization to these stimuli, which could clearly be differentiated from the sustained responses seen in non-cystic fibrosis subjects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7875281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


  23 in total

Review 1.  Prospects for gene therapy in cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  A Jaffé; A Bush; D M Geddes; E W Alton
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 2.  New therapeutic approaches for cystic fibrosis lung disease.

Authors:  Jane C Davies
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  Cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Jane C Davies; Eric W F W Alton; Andrew Bush
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-12-15

4.  An international randomized multicenter comparison of nasal potential difference techniques.

Authors:  George M Solomon; Michael W Konstan; Michael Wilschanski; Joanne Billings; Isabelle Sermet-Gaudelus; Frank Accurso; François Vermeulen; Elina Levin; Heather Hathorne; Ginger Reeves; Gina Sabbatini; Aubrey Hill; Nicole Mayer-Hamblett; Melissa Ashlock; John Paul Clancy; Steven M Rowe
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 5.  Gene therapy for cystic fibrosis: which postman, which box?

Authors:  P G Middleton; E W Alton
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Chronic pancreatitis and mutations of the cystic fibrosis gene.

Authors:  C J Taylor
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 7.  Gene therapy: the case for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  E W Alton; D Geddes
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Partial correction of cystic fibrosis defects with PLGA nanoparticles encapsulating curcumin.

Authors:  Malgorzata S Cartiera; Elisa C Ferreira; Christina Caputo; Marie E Egan; Michael J Caplan; W Mark Saltzman
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  The relevance of sweat testing for the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis in the genomic era.

Authors:  Avantika Mishra; Ronda Greaves; John Massie
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2005-11

10.  Nasal Potential Difference to Quantify Trans-epithelial Ion Transport in Mice.

Authors:  Mathilde Beka; Teresinha Leal
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 1.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.