Literature DB >> 7875182

Sedation with meperidine and midazolam in pediatric patients undergoing endoscopy.

N Bahal-O'Mara1, M C Nahata, R D Murray, T R Linscheid, M Fishbein, L A Heitlinger, B U Li, H J McClung, C Potter, B Lininger.   

Abstract

We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of meperidine 2 mg.kg-1 (M) and meperidine 2 mg.kg-1 plus midazolam 0.05 mg.kg-1 (M + M) in 40 pediatric outpatients (age 1 to 17 years) undergoing upper endoscopy procedures. The physician and nurse performing the procedure were asked to rate cooperation, emotional status, drowsiness, and overall efficacy. A blinded observer recorded the frequency of negative behaviors indicating distress, vital signs, and oxygen saturation before, during, and after the procedure. No significant differences were noted in the overall efficacy of the regimens. Good or excellent efficacy was noted in 15 of 21 children (71%) in the M group and 15 of 19 children (79%) in the M + M group by physicians; nurses assigned a good or excellent rating for 14 of 21 (67%) and 13 of 19 (68%) in the M and M + M groups, respectively. Immediately following the procedure, amnesia was noted in 4 of 17 (23%) patients who received M versus 14 of 18 (78%) patients who received M + M (P = 0.002). Of the children who received M + M, the amnesia tended to occur more frequently in older children (> 11 years, 8 children, rate of amnesia 100%) than in younger children (< or = 11 years, 6 of 10 evaluable children, rate of amnesia 60%). There was no significant difference between the frequency of negative behaviors, rate of adverse effects, or changes in vital signs or oxygen saturation noted with the two drug regimens.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7875182     DOI: 10.1007/bf00191162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  19 in total

1.  Premedication for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: still a matter for debate?

Authors:  G Bianchi Porro; M Lazzaroni
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Randomized, double-blind trial of midazolam and diazepam for endoscopic sedation in children.

Authors:  V Tolia; S L Fleming; R E Kauffman
Journal:  Dev Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1990

3.  1989 A/S/G/E survey of endoscopic sedation and monitoring practices.

Authors:  E B Keeffe; K W O'Connor
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy without sedation: a prospective study of 2000 examinations.

Authors:  H A al-Atrakchi
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1989 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 5.  Sedation in pediatric patients undergoing diagnostic procedures.

Authors:  M C Nahata
Journal:  Drug Intell Clin Pharm       Date:  1988-09

Review 6.  The use of midazolam in premedication.

Authors:  S G Lindahl
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl       Date:  1990

7.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of midazolam in children during esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

Authors:  V Tolia; S Brennan; M K Aravind; R E Kauffman
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.406

8.  The effect of age on the relative potency of midazolam and diazepam for sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  S G Scholer; D F Schafer; J F Potter
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.062

9.  Intravenous midazolam for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a study of 800 consecutive cases relating dose to age and sex of patient.

Authors:  G D Bell; G P Spickett; P A Reeve; A Morden; R F Logan
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Patients appreciate premedication for endoscopy.

Authors:  D G Thompson; J E Lennard-Jones; S J Evans; R E Cowan; R S Murray; J T Wright
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-08-30       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  3 in total

1.  Ensuring safe and effective medication use in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Milap C Nahata
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-01

Review 2.  Clinical pharmacology of midazolam in infants and children.

Authors:  J L Blumer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  What is the level of evidence for the amnestic effects of sedatives in pediatric patients? A systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Karolline Alves Viana; Anelise Daher; Lucianne Cople Maia; Paulo Sucasas Costa; Carolina de Castro Martins; Saul Martins Paiva; Luciane Rezende Costa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.