Comparison of four methods for cross-calibrating dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers to eliminate systematic errors when upgrading equipment.

Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a widely employed technique for making noninvasive measurements of bone mineral density (BMD). Advances in DXA technology have resulted in the development of new densitometers that offer increased scan speed, improved spatial resolution, and the ability to make measurements at additional skeletal sites. However, changing from a first to a second-generation DXA system generates two additional potential sources of error. First, if the densitometers produce results that are substantially different, diagnostic errors occur if the results from both instruments are compared to the same normative database. Second, even if the densitometers produce results that are nearly identical, small systematic errors may influence interpretation of serial bone density measurements in individual patients. To assess the impact of changing from a first- to a second-generation DXA scanner, we made measurements using the standard "pencil beam" mode on 133 consecutive patients using both a Hologic QDR-1000 and a QDR-2000 densitometer when the latter instrument was calibrated according to the manufacturer's routine procedure using a single anthropomorphic spine phantom. We then recalculated the results for the QDR-2000 densitometer using cross-calibration factors based on (1) a regression line generated by scanning three anthropomorphic spine phantoms whose BMD ranged from osteoporotic to high normal on each instrument, (2) an adult human lumbar spine embedded in tissue-equivalent plastic, or (3) a regression line derived from scans of the first 83 patients that was then applied to the last 50 patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)