Literature DB >> 7870218

The contribution of ultrasonography to the differential diagnosis of breast cancer.

S Ciatto1, M Rosselli del Turco, S Catarzi, D Morrone.   

Abstract

Overall consecutive breast abnormalities (259 carcinomas, 1820 benign) examined with breast ultrasonography (US) are reported. US sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value were 67.6, 97.7 and 81.0%, resp. (the corresponding values were 57.9, 97.9 and 77.2% for palpation, 79.9, 93.5 and 73.7% for mammography, and 97.6, 92.6 and 87.6% for cytology). US sensitivity was unaffected by age, whereas it was strongly influenced by tumor size (pT1-76.1%; pT2-87.1%) and histologic type (intraductal-7.4%; invasive ductal/lobular-83.4%; invasive special types-64.1%). The features of the lesions at US were significantly associated with cancer (irregular margins, posterior acoustic shadowing) or benign lesions (anechoic structure, lateral shadowing, posterior acoustic enhancement) but had a limited diagnostic accuracy. Overall, US visualized 174 (benign-24, suspicious-150) of 188 palpable, and 32 (benign-7, suspicious-25) of 71 nonpalpable cancers. US contribution was determinant to final diagnosis in 4 of 7 cancers, missed at palpation and mammography, but was at least partially responsible for 8 unnecessary biopsies of benign lesions. A negative/benign US report contributed to avoid unnecessary biopsy in 71 suspicious cases at palpation/mammography. Routine US examination of clinical/mammographic abnormalities is recommended for the advantages of US-guided aspiration and to reduce the frequency of unnecessary biopsies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7870218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neoplasma        ISSN: 0028-2685            Impact factor:   2.575


  4 in total

1.  Three-dimensional sonographic study of breast nodules.

Authors:  T Abbattista; L Serri; P Busilacchi
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2007-06-07

2.  Comparative accuracy of mammography and ultrasound in women with breast symptoms according to age and breast density.

Authors:  Emine Devolli-Disha; Suzana Manxhuka-Kërliu; Halit Ymeri; Arben Kutllovci
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.363

3.  Comparison of written reports of mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance mammography for preoperative evaluation of breast lesions, with special emphasis on magnetic resonance mammography.

Authors:  S Malur; S Wurdinger; A Moritz; W Michels; A Schneider
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2000-11-02       Impact factor: 6.466

4.  Clinical Factors Associated with Asymptomatic Women Having Inconclusive Screening Mammography Results: Experiences from a Single Medical Center in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chun-Li Wang; Pi-Shan Hsu; Chia-Yen Lin; Shun-Fa Yang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.