Literature DB >> 23396171

Three-dimensional sonographic study of breast nodules.

T Abbattista1, L Serri, P Busilacchi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We examined breast nodules with three-dimensional (3D) sonography and power-Doppler to identify new parameters that might be useful in differentiating benign and malignant lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Breast nodules in 34 women were examined with a Voluson-GE 730 scanner and a 7.5 MHz linear-array dedicated 3D probe. Each nodule was examined in the B-mode, and its vascular characteristics were evaluated with power-Doppler; 3D reconstruction was used in both studies. All examinations were performed by the same operator, who was unaware of the case characteristics. The examiner classified each lesion as benign or malignant based on B-mode appearance, margin characteristics, infiltration, and blood vessel distribution on power-Doppler; lesion volume was also calculated for T staging. Results were compared with those of biopsies, which were performed on all nodules after the sonographic examination.
RESULTS: Biopsy findings revealed that 29 nodules were benign and 5 malignant. Based on the 3D sonographic examination, 27 lesions were considered benign, and 7 were classified as malignant. Two of the latter diagnoses were false-positives; there were no false negatives (specificity: 93.1%, sensitivity: 100%, accuracy: 94.1%).
CONCLUSIONS: 3D sonography can be used to calculate lesional mass for T1 staging of malignant breast nodules. It can also reveal wall irregularities in benign lesions that are missed on two-dimensional (2D) scans and the limits of infiltration of malignant lesions. The 3D power-Doppler examination provides a panoramic full-length view of blood vessels supplying the nodule, and the number of vessels visualized with this approach is higher than that observed on 2D studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D sonography; Breast nodules; Power-Doppler

Year:  2007        PMID: 23396171      PMCID: PMC3478705          DOI: 10.1016/j.jus.2007.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound        ISSN: 1876-7931


  15 in total

1.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?

Authors:  C K Kuhl; P Mielcareck; S Klaschik; C Leutner; E Wardelmann; J Gieseke; H H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Does 3-D sonography bring any advantage to noninvasive breast diagnostics?

Authors:  G C Meyberg-Solomayer; B Kraemer; A Bergmann; E Kraemer; U Krainick; D Wallwiener; E-F Solomayer
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  A comparative study of 2D and 3D ultrasonography for evaluation of solid breast masses.

Authors:  Kyu Ran Cho; Bo Kyoung Seo; June Young Lee; Etta D Pisano; Bo Kyung Je; Ji Young Lee; Eun Jeong Choi; Kyoo Byung Chung; Yu Whan Oh
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions.

Authors:  A T Stavros; D Thickman; C L Rapp; M A Dennis; S H Parker; G A Sisney
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer.

Authors:  S G Orel; M D Schnall
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of breast cancer by a real-time intraoperative navigation system.

Authors:  Tomoo Inoue; Yasuhiro Tamaki; Yoshinobu Sato; Masahiko Nakamoto; Shinichi Tamura; Yoshio Tanji; Tetsuya Taguchi; Shinzaburo Noguchi
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.239

7.  Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US--diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics.

Authors:  T M Kolb; J Lichy; J H Newhouse
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  The contribution of ultrasonography to the differential diagnosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  S Ciatto; M Rosselli del Turco; S Catarzi; D Morrone
Journal:  Neoplasma       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.575

9.  Ductal enhancement on MR imaging of the breast.

Authors:  Laura Liberman; Elizabeth A Morris; D David Dershaw; Andrea F Abramson; Lee K Tan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination.

Authors:  Ellen Warner; Donald B Plewes; Kimberley A Hill; Petrina A Causer; Judit T Zubovits; Roberta A Jong; Margaret R Cutrara; Gerrit DeBoer; Martin J Yaffe; Sandra J Messner; Wendy S Meschino; Cameron A Piron; Steven A Narod
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  2 in total

1.  Correlation between three-dimensional ultrasound features and pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer.

Authors:  Jun Jiang; Ya-qing Chen; Yi-zhuan Xu; Ming-li Chen; Yun-kai Zhu; Wen-bin Guan; Xiao-jin Wang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Benign breast lesions: Ultrasound.

Authors:  N Masciadri; C Ferranti
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2011-04-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.