Literature DB >> 7869489

Comparison between standard flank versus laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign renal disease.

R O Parra1, M G Perez, J A Boullier, J M Cummings.   

Abstract

To evaluate the role of laparoscopic nephrectomy in the management of benign renal diseases, 12 patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy were compared to 13 undergoing a classical flank nephrectomy. Both groups were similar in regard to patient age and indications for surgery. The underlying pathological conditions included vesicoureteral reflux, tuberculosis, hydronephrosis, hypertension and failed pyeloplasty. Overall, operative time ranged from 105 to 360 minutes (mean 145) for the laparoscopic group and 60 to 240 minutes (mean 156.6) for the open surgery group. Hospital stay and interval to return to regular preoperative activities were 2 to 6 days (mean 3.5) and 10 to 21 days (mean 16) for patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy, which was significantly shorter than for those undergoing a flank procedure, 3 to 16 days (mean 8) and 35 to 84 days (mean 32.3), respectively. Pain medication requirements were also markedly decreased after laparoscopic nephrectomy. Of the patients in the laparoscopic group 2 experienced complications with only 1 requiring conversion to open nephrectomy. The laparoscopic technique is an effective as the flank approach for benign renal conditions, while providing a more rapid recuperation and superior cosmetic result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7869489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  7 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic renal surgery for benign disease.

Authors:  Joseph C Liao; Alberto Breda; Peter G Schulam
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Initiation of a pediatric robotic surgery program: institutional challenges and realistic outcomes.

Authors:  Mathew D Sorensen; Michael H Johnson; Catherine Delostrinos; Jeff B Bice; Richard W Grady; Thomas S Lendvay
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  J L Flowers; S Jacobs; E Cho; A Morton; W F Rosenberger; D Evans; A L Imbembo; S T Bartlett
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  [Laparoscopic vs. open nephrectomy. 10 years' results of a nonrandomized comparative study of 549 patients with benign kidney diseases].

Authors:  P Fornara; M Zacharias; M Steinacker; C Doehn; D Jocham
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-01-23       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Technical considerations and pitfalls in laparoscopic live donornephrectomy.

Authors:  F J Berends; P T den Hoed; H J Bonjer; G Kazemier; I van Riemsdijk; W Weimar; J N M IJzermans
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-02-27       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Is LESS really more?

Authors:  Joseph A Graversen; Achim Lusch; Jaime Landman
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2012-01

7.  Have we overcome the complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy? A prospective, cohort study using the modified Clavien-Dindo scale.

Authors:  Tapan Agrawal; Rajeev Kumar; Prabhjot Singh; Ashish Saini; Amlesh Seth; Premnath Dogra
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.