Literature DB >> 12163950

Technical considerations and pitfalls in laparoscopic live donornephrectomy.

F J Berends1, P T den Hoed, H J Bonjer, G Kazemier, I van Riemsdijk, W Weimar, J N M IJzermans.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent developments in laparoscopic solid organ surgery suggest a possible reduction in postoperative discomfort and disability for kidney donors. Technical aspects and the influence of surgical experience in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy were evaluated.
METHODS: The clinical outcome of 57 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies (LapNx) was compared with that for a historic control group of 27 open donor nephrectomies (OpenNx).
RESULTS: Three conversions to open nephrectomy (5.2%) were necessary. Postoperative complications were minor and comparable in both groups. Patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery demonstrated significantly less postoperative pain and a shorter hospital stay, but operative time and warm ischemia time were significantly longer. Graft survival after LapNx was 100% during a median follow-up period of 13 months. Operative time for LapNx decreased considerably with experience gained and seemed to be less for right nephrectomy. Stenotic ureter-bladder anastomoses occurred after LapNx in four patients during the first half year (7.0%), but this problem seemed to be resolved after modification of the technique.
CONCLUSION: LapNx is associated with less postoperative discomfort and improved convalescence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12163950     DOI: 10.1007/s004640090078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  25 in total

1.  Results of pyeloureterostomy after ureterovesical anastomosis complications in renal transplantation.

Authors:  L Salomon; F Saporta; D Amsellem; A Hozneck; M Colombel; J J Patard; D Chopin; C C Abbou
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Endoscopy-assisted live donor nephrectomy: comparison between laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic procedures.

Authors:  A Ishikawa; K Suzuki; K Saisu; S Kageyama; T Ushiyama; K Fujita
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.066

3.  Comparison of three techniques for adrenalectomy.

Authors:  H J Bonjer; J F Lange; G Kazemier; W W de Herder; E W Steyerberg; H A Bruining
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: lessons learned from 100 consecutive procedures.

Authors:  M Gagner; A Pomp; B T Heniford; D Pharand; A Lacroix
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Effects of split torso positioning and laparoscopic surgery for donor nephrectomy on respiratory mechanics.

Authors:  B G Fahy; G M Barnas; J L Flowers; S C Jacobs; J S Plotkin; P A Delaney
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.452

6.  Long-term effects of reduced renal mass in humans.

Authors:  B L Kasiske; J Z Ma; T A Louis; S K Swan
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 10.612

7.  Renal effects of carbon dioxide insufflation in rabbit pneumoretroperitoneum model.

Authors:  C Güler; M Sade; Z Kirkali
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Living related kidney donors. A 14-year experience.

Authors:  J F Dunn; W A Nylander; R E Richie; H K Johnson; R C MacDonell; J L Sawyers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Transperitoneal nephrectomy for benign disease of the kidney: a comparison of laparoscopic and open surgical techniques.

Authors:  K Kerbl; R V Clayman; E M McDougall; I S Gill; B S Wilson; P S Chandhoke; D M Albala; L R Kavoussi
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  High survival rates of kidney transplants from spousal and living unrelated donors.

Authors:  P I Terasaki; J M Cecka; D W Gjertson; S Takemoto
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-08-10       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  5 in total

1.  Long-term impact of pneumoperitoneum used for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy on renal function and histomorphology in donor and recipient rats.

Authors:  Eric J Hazebroek; Ron W F de Bruin; Nicole D Bouvy; Richard L Marquet; Fred Bonthuis; Ingeborg M Bajema; Don P Hayes; Jan N M Ijzermans; H Jaap Bonjer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Comparison of laparoscopic and mini incision open donor nephrectomy: single blind, randomised controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Niels F M Kok; May Y Lind; Birgitta M E Hansson; Desiree Pilzecker; Ingrid R A M Mertens zur Borg; Ben C Knipscheer; Eric J Hazebroek; Ine M Dooper; Willem Weimar; Wim C J Hop; Eddy M M Adang; Gert Jan van der Wilt; Hendrik J Bonjer; Jordanus A van der Vliet; Jan N M IJzermans
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-07-17

3.  Impact of intraoperative donor management on short-term renal function after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  Eric J Hazebroek; Diederik Gommers; Michiel A Schreve; Teun van Gelder; Joke I Roodnat; Willem Weimar; H Jaap Bonjer; Jan N M IJzermans
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  Nitin Gupta; Pamposh Raina; Anant Kumar
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.407

5.  Transperitoneal laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: Current status.

Authors:  A Srivastava; N Gupta; Anant Kumar; Rakesh Kapoor; Deepak Dubey
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.