Literature DB >> 7867817

Factors affecting the outcome of children treated for amblyopia.

G Woodruff1, F Hiscox, J R Thompson, L K Smith.   

Abstract

The outcome of treatment for amblyopia and the factors that affect this are not well understood. A major reason for this has been the exclusion from previous large studies of a sometimes unknown number of patients because of failure to comply with treatment. This paper analyses the outcome of amblyopia treatment in a retrospective review of the orthoptic records of a cohort of 961 children treated for amblyopia at seven centres who first attended in 1983. The final visual acuity was recorded by Snellen or matching methods in 894 children (93%). Of these, 48% achieved 6/9 or better, 35% less than 6/9 but better than or equal to 6/18, and 17% achieved less than 6/18. The outcome was best for pure anisometropic amblyopia, intermediate for pure strabismic amblyopia and least good for mixed strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia with a final visual acuity of 6/10.2, 6/12.8 and 6/14.8 respectively. While the age at start of treatment did not correlate with final visual acuity both poor initial visual acuity and poor compliance were associated with poor outcome. The main factor affecting the outcome of amblyopia treatment is the initial visual acuity. Comparison with the literature suggests that the results of treatment in this country may be falling far short of what would be possible in ideal circumstances with unlimited resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7867817     DOI: 10.1038/eye.1994.157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  49 in total

1.  Differences in the management of amblyopia between European countries.

Authors:  J H Y Tan; J R Thompson; I Gottlob
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Efficacy of occlusion for strabismic amblyopia: can an optimal duration be identified?

Authors:  M Cleary
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Treatment of unilateral visual impairment on preschool vision screening: study leaves questions unanswered.

Authors:  Hirekatur V Srinivas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-02-07

4.  Screening for visual impairment in children younger than age 5 years: recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Binocular iPad treatment for amblyopia in preschool children.

Authors:  Eileen E Birch; Simone L Li; Reed M Jost; Sarah E Morale; Angie De La Cruz; David Stager; Lori Dao; David R Stager
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.220

6.  The therapy of amblyopia: an analysis comparing the results of amblyopia therapy utilizing two pooled data sets.

Authors:  J T Flynn; G Woodruff; J R Thompson; F Hiscox; W Feuer; J Schiffman; A Corona; L K Smith
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1999

7.  Structural and functional comparison of the persistent and resolved amblyopia.

Authors:  Betul Tugcu; Bilge Araz-Ersan; Ezgi Tuna Erdogan; Hatice Tarakcioglu; Cigdem Coskun; Ulviye Yigit; Sacit Karamursel
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Photorefractive keratectomy for anisometropic amblyopia in children.

Authors:  Evelyn A Paysse
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2004

9.  Amblyopia therapy in Asian children: factors affecting visual outcome and parents' perception of children's attitudes towards amblyopia treatment.

Authors:  Swati Handa; Audrey Chia
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 1.858

10.  Rethinking amblyopia 2020.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.