Literature DB >> 12598440

Differences in the management of amblyopia between European countries.

J H Y Tan1, J R Thompson, I Gottlob.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Amblyopia treatment is not standardised and differences between centres and countries have not been systematically investigated. This survey compares the different patterns of orthoptic treatment of amblyopia in the United Kingdom (UK) and three German speaking countries (GSC).
METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to orthoptists in the UK and the GSC asking for their preferred choices of treatment of amblyopia between the ages of 6 months to 10 years.
RESULTS: The following significant differences in management of amblyopia were found: (1) the number of hours of occlusion per week was higher in the GSC, p<0.0001, (2) orthoptists in the GSC treat amblyopia up to an older age. Orthoptists in the GSC and in the UK predicted similar treatment outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Orthoptists in the GSC usually treat patients more intensively and for longer, while the prediction of visual outcome does not differ significantly between countries. These results highlight the lack of standardisation in the treatment of the various types of amblyopia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12598440      PMCID: PMC1771562          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.87.3.291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  17 in total

1.  Occlusion for amblyopia: a comprehensive survey of outcome.

Authors:  F Hiscox; N Strong; J R Thompson; C Minshull; G Woodruff
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  The therapy of amblyopia: an analysis comparing the results of amblyopia therapy utilizing two pooled data sets.

Authors:  J T Flynn; G Woodruff; J R Thompson; F Hiscox; W Feuer; J Schiffman; A Corona; L K Smith
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1999

3.  Stability of visual acuity in amblyopic patients after visual maturity.

Authors:  W E Scott; C F Dickey
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 4.  Current trends in amblyopia therapy.

Authors:  J T Flynn; J C Cassady
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  A comparison of various methods of treatment of amblyopia. A block study.

Authors:  P G Watson; A S Sanac; M S Pickering
Journal:  Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K       Date:  1985

6.  Compliance in amblyopia therapy: objective monitoring of occlusion.

Authors:  A R Fielder; M Irwin; R Auld; K D Cocker; H S Jones; M J Moseley
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Electronic monitoring of treatment compliance in patching for amblyopia.

Authors:  H J Simonsz; J R Polling; R Voorn; J van Leeuwen; H Meester; C Romijn; B G Dijkstra
Journal:  Strabismus       Date:  1999-06

Review 8.  Non-compliance--or how many aunts has Matilda?

Authors:  E C Wright
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-10-09       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Factors affecting the outcome of children treated for amblyopia.

Authors:  G Woodruff; F Hiscox; J R Thompson; L K Smith
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Preferential looking as a guide for amblyopia therapy in monocular infantile cataracts.

Authors:  R A Catalano; J W Simon; P L Jenkins; G L Kandel
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.402

View more
  4 in total

1.  Objective survey of the prescription of occlusion therapy for amblyopia.

Authors:  Sjoukje E Loudon; Jan-Roelof Polling; Brigitte Simonsz; Huibert J Simonsz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  The treatment of amblyopia: current practice and emerging trends.

Authors:  Eleni Papageorgiou; Ioannis Asproudis; Gail Maconachie; Evangelia E Tsironi; Irene Gottlob
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  The challenges of amblyopia treatment.

Authors:  Gail D E Maconachie; Irene Gottlob
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 4.910

Review 4.  Atropine Penalization Versus Occlusion Therapies for Unilateral Amblyopia after the Critical Period of Visual Development: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Daniel C Osborne; Kathryn M Greenhalgh; Megan J E Evans; Jay E Self
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2018-10-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.