Extended comparison of quality of life between stable heart failure patients and heart transplant recipients.

Heart failure has been associated with poor quality of life, which can improve after heart transplantation. Long-term quality-of-life comparisons between patients with heart failure stabilized with medical therapy and heart transplant recipients have not been performed. We assessed quality of life at the time of heart transplantation evaluation and again after 41 months in 12 patients with advanced heart failure stabilized with medical therapy and in 19 patients who had gone on to undergo heart transplantation. Quality of life was measured by three questionnaires. Both groups had similar quality-of-life and clinical features during the transplantation evaluation. Over time, feelings of anxiety and depression, psychologic adaptation, and perceived functional capability improved in the transplant recipients. However, transplant recipients reported more weakness after surgery; this was the major symptom that limited activities. At follow-up 41 months later, we found no significant differences in quality-of-life changes over time between patients stabilized with medical therapy and heart transplant recipients. Overall quality of life for patients who remain stable while receiving medical therapy may not be significantly different from patients who have undergone transplantation.