Literature DB >> 25696233

Development of the Rotterdam Quality of Life Questionnaire for Heart Transplant Recipients.

J H de Jeu, S S Pedersen, A H M M Balk, R T van Domburg, P J M J Vantrimpont, R A M Erdman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation is a unique and life-threatening event followed by role and lifestyle adjustments, feelings of dependency, and fears about infections and rejection of the donor heart. Generic quality of life measures are unlikely to cover aspects pertinent to transplant recipients. The disease-specific measures available are lengthy and not feasible for use in clinical practice. AIM: The purpose of the current study was to develop a brief and reliable disease-specific instrument to measure quality of life in heart transplant patients. STUDY
DESIGN: Survey.
METHODS: The Rotterdam Quality of Life Questionnaire for Heart Transplant Recipients was developed according to a series of steps that included in-depth interviews with heart transplant patients, transcription of interviews to form a comprehensive item pool, reduction of the item pool through submission to a panel of healthcare professionals and transplant patients, and further reduction of the item pool through construct formation and statistical analyses. From July to September 2000, all surviving patients (n=237) following heart transplantation at the Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam were asked to fill in the 55-item questionnaire, 205 (86%) of whom replied.
RESULTS: Twelve of the 55 original items were identified as contributing to overall quality of life in heart transplant patients based on four à priori selected constructs. Submission of the 12 items to a factor analysis confirmed that the four-factor structure accounted for 62% of the variance. The reliability of the four subscales was adequate. Mean scores on subscales reflected light to moderate impairment in quality of life.
CONCLUSION: The Rotterdam Quality of Life Questionnaire for Heart Transplant Recipients is a brief disease-specific instrument that measures quality of life in heart transplant patients. Although further studies are required to elaborate on the psychometric properties of the scale, the preliminary reliability of the scale looks promising.

Entities:  

Keywords:  heart transplantation; quality of life; questionnaire

Year:  2003        PMID: 25696233      PMCID: PMC2499860     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neth Heart J        ISSN: 1568-5888            Impact factor:   2.380


  20 in total

Review 1.  Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life.

Authors:  D L Patrick; R A Deyo
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Symptom distress three months after heart transplantation.

Authors:  A Jalowiec; K L Grady; C White-Williams; S Fazekas; M Laff; V Davidson-Bell; E Kracht; W Willson
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 10.247

3.  Positive expectations predict health after heart transplantation.

Authors:  B Leedham; B E Meyerowitz; J Muirhead; W H Frist
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.267

4.  Heart transplant candidates' perception of helpfulness of health care provider interventions.

Authors:  K L Grady; A Jalowiec; C White-Williams; M Hetfleisch; J Penicook; M Blood
Journal:  Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct

5.  Stressors in patients awaiting a heart transplant.

Authors:  A Jalowiec; K L Grady; C White-Williams
Journal:  Behav Med       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.104

6.  Symptom distress in cardiac transplant candidates.

Authors:  K L Grady; A Jalowiec; B B Grusk; C White-Williams; J A Robinson
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.210

7.  Emotional adjustment to cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  W F Kuhn; M H Davis; S B Lippmann
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.238

8.  Psychosocial, neuropsychological and neurological status in a sample of heart transplant recipients.

Authors:  B Strauss; T Thormann; H Strenge; E Biernath; U Foerst; C Stauch; U Torp; A Bernhard; H Speidel
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  [Psychosocial aspects of heart transplantation; 4-year experience].

Authors:  G J Bonsel; R A Erdman; R C van der Mast; A H Balk; P J van der Maas
Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd       Date:  1990-02-03

10.  Extended comparison of quality of life between stable heart failure patients and heart transplant recipients.

Authors:  J A Walden; L W Stevenson; K Dracup; J F Hook; D K Moser; M Hamilton; G C Fonarow
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 10.247

View more
  1 in total

1.  Exercise interventions for cancer survivors: a meta-analysis of quality of life outcomes.

Authors:  Rebecca A Ferrer; Tania B Huedo-Medina; Blair T Johnson; Stacey Ryan; Linda S Pescatello
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2011-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.