Literature DB >> 7863927

Radiation doses to patients in neurointerventional procedures.

P Bergeron1, R Carrier, D Roy, N Blais, J Raymond.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate stochastic and deterministic risks associated with neurointerventional procedures for the patient.
METHODS: Eight neurovascular interventional procedures were evaluated to determine the entrance skin dose and effective dose for the patient. Dosimetry was done with thermoluminescence dosimeters. The highest dose on the patient's head was recorded as the maximum entrance skin dose. The equivalent dose was obtained by conversion of the dose-area product using published conversion tables.
RESULTS: The maximum entrance skin dose varied from 129 to 1335 mGy. The mean effective dose was 1.67 mSv with a range of 0.44 to 3.44 mSv. No deterministic effect has been encountered. Stochastic risk linked to the highest effective dose value was approximately one death by fatal cancer for every 6000 procedures, according to the new International Commission on Radiological Protection coefficient.
CONCLUSIONS: Because no deterministic effect has been detected, and stochastic risks were very low, radiation hazard to the patient is a minor consideration in deciding whether to undertake a neurointerventional procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7863927      PMCID: PMC8334274     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  12 in total

1.  The principle of digital subtraction angiography and radiological protection.

Authors:  K Okamoto; J Ito; K Sakai; S Yoshimura
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  Cumulative radiation dose during hospitalization for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  S I Moskowitz; W J Davros; M E Kelly; D Fiorella; P A Rasmussen; T J Masaryk
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Dose measurement on both patients and operators during neurointerventional procedures using photoluminescence glass dosimeters.

Authors:  T Moritake; Y Matsumaru; T Takigawa; K Nishizawa; A Matsumura; K Tsuboi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  Clinical Presentation, Imaging, and Management of Complications due to Neurointerventional Procedures.

Authors:  Matthew C Davis; John P Deveikis; Mark R Harrigan
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  Treatment of obstructive epiphora in adults by balloon dacryocystoplasty.

Authors:  Z Yazici; B Yazici; M Parlak; H Erturk; G Savci
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Radiation dermatitis after spinal arteriovenous malformation embolization: case report.

Authors:  G J Carstens; M B Horowitz; P D Purdy; A G Pandya
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Patient skin dose during neuroembolization by multiple-point measurement using a radiosensitive indicator.

Authors:  S Suzuki; S Furui; Y Matsumaru; S Nobuyuki; M Ebara; T Abe; D Itoh
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Local skin and eye lens equivalent doses in interventional neuroradiology.

Authors:  Michael Sandborg; Sandro Rossitti; Håkan Pettersson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Effect of ROI filtering in 3D cone-beam rotational angiography on organ dose and effective dose in cerebral investigations.

Authors:  Fabian Göpfert; Ralph Schmidt; Jörg Wulff; Klemens Zink
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 10.  Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms in the development of arteriovenous malformations in the brain.

Authors:  Jaya Mary Thomas; Sumi Surendran; Mathew Abraham; Arumugam Rajavelu; Chandrasekharan C Kartha
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 6.551

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.