Literature DB >> 7861831

Minimum data needed on patient preferences for accurate, efficient medical decision making.

J C Hornberger1, H Habraken, D A Bloch.   

Abstract

Involving patients in their health care decisions improves patient satisfaction and outcomes, but can be costly because of the materials and time needed to discuss the many issues that constitute a medical problem. The authors present a framework for identifying the minimum data needed on patient preferences for accurate medical decision making. The method is illustrated for the decision of whether patients with end-stage renal disease should undergo short or long hemodialysis treatments. The value of health states to patients was modeled as a function of six outcomes: survival, uremic symptoms, hospital days per year, the inconvenience associated with long dialysis treatment duration, presence of hypotension during dialysis, and presence of other symptoms during dialysis. The relative importance of each outcome was characterized in a value function by weights referred to as preference-scaling factors. These factors were varied at random over a uniform distribution to simulate different patterns of patient preferences on the six outcomes. The decision model's recommendation was recorded for each simulation. Classification and regression-tree (CART) and stepwise logistic regression analyses were applied to these recommendations to determine the scaling-factor levels that predict short or long treatments. Knowledge of scaling factors on only the inconvenience of long dialysis treatment duration, the worst alive state of health on hemodialysis, and presence of hypotension identified the correct treatment in more than 97% of simulations. Fifty-five patients undergoing hemodialysis were then surveyed for their scaling factors on the six dimensions of well-being. When patients' scaling factors were applied to the predictive rule generated by CART using simulated scaling factors, more than 94% of treatment decisions were classified correctly--sensitivity and specificity of predicting long dialysis were 89% and 100%, respectively. These statistical techniques applied to results of a decision model help identify the minimum data needed on patient preferences to involve patients in efficient and accurate decisions about their health care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7861831     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199503000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  7 in total

1.  Clustering and the design of preference-assessment surveys in healthcare.

Authors:  A Lin; L A Lenert; M A Hlatky; K M McDonald; R A Olshen; J Hornberger
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Rapid approximation of confidence intervals for Markov process decision models: applications in decision support systems.

Authors:  D J Cher; L A Lenert
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  What can patients do to improve health care?

Authors:  Michel Wensing; Richard Grol
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Improving patient-provider communication about chronic pain: development and feasibility testing of a shared decision-making tool.

Authors:  Nananda Col; Stephen Hull; Vicky Springmann; Long Ngo; Ernie Merritt; Susan Gold; Michael Sprintz; Noel Genova; Noah Nesin; Brenda Tierman; Frank Sanfilippo; Richard Entel; Lori Pbert
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 5.  The views of patients and carers in treatment decision making for chronic kidney disease: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.

Authors:  R L Morton; A Tong; K Howard; P Snelling; A C Webster
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-01-19

6.  What questions do patients undergoing lower extremity joint replacement surgery have?

Authors:  Alex Macario; Peter Schilling; Richard Rubio; Amandeep Bhalla; Stuart Goodman
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-06-24       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  A Novel Tool to Improve Shared Decision Making and Adherence in Multiple Sclerosis: Development and Preliminary Testing.

Authors:  Nananda Col; Enrique Alvarez; Vicky Springmann; Carolina Ionete; Idanis Berrios Morales; Andrew Solomon; Christen Kutz; Carolyn Griffin; Brenda Tierman; Terrie Livingston; Michelle Patel; Danny van Leeuwen; Long Ngo; Lori Pbert
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2019-10-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.