Literature DB >> 7859517

Anesthesia related hypoxemia. The effect of pulse oximetry monitoring on perioperative events and postoperative complications.

J T Møller1.   

Abstract

The objectives of the present investigation were to evaluate the extent of perioperative hypoxemia and to investigate the impact of pulse oximetry monitoring on the extent of hypoxemia and on perioperative morbidity in adults. To accomplish these objectives a number of prospective studies were carried out. The incidence, duration, and severity of hypoxemia were evaluated in two single blinded observer studies in the operating room (N = 296) (I) and in the Postanesthesia Care Unit (N = 200) (II). Pulse oximetry monitoring's effect on the extent of hypoxemia was evaluated in a randomized blinded observer study of 200 patients (III). The impact of pulse oximetry on the frequency of perioperative events, changes in patient care, and post-operative complications were studied in a randomized evaluation of 20,802 patients (IV-V). Finally, a subgroup of 736 patients already included in the randomized evaluation was psychologically evaluated pre- and postoperatively (VI). In the observer studies in the OR and PACU mild hypoxemia (SpO2 86-90%) was recorded in 53% and 55% of the patients, respectively. Severe hypoxemia with SpO2 values < 81% was recorded in 20% and 13% of the patients, respectively. In the randomized blinded observer study, patients with pulse oximeter data available had a significantly reduced incidence of perioperative hypoxemia when compared to patients where the data were unavailable. Most noteworthy was that in the available group extreme hypoxemia (SpO2 < 76%) was not encountered in the OR and both severe (SpO2 76-80%) and extreme hypoxemia were not observed in the PACU. In the randomized evaluation of pulse oximetry significantly more patients in the oximetry group experienced at least one respiratory event than did control patients in both the OR and in the PACU. This was a result of a 19 fold increase in the incidence of diagnosed hypoxemia in the oximetry group than in the control group. In the OR cardiovascular events were observed in a similar number of patients in both groups, except myocardial ischemia, which was detected in 12 patients in the oximetry group and in 26 patients in the control group (P < 0.03). Several changes in PACU care were observed in association with the use of pulse oximetry. These included higher flow rates of supplemental oxygen (P < 0.00001), increased use of supplemental oxygen at discharge (P < 0.00001), and increased use of naloxone (P < 0.02). One or more postoperative complications occurred in 10% of the patients in the oximetry group and in 9.4% in the control group (NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7859517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dan Med Bull        ISSN: 0907-8916


  5 in total

Review 1.  Pulse oximetry for perioperative monitoring.

Authors:  Tom Pedersen; Amanda Nicholson; Karen Hovhannisyan; Ann Merete Møller; Andrew F Smith; Sharon R Lewis
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-03-17

2.  Tracheal Extubation Under Deep Anesthesia Using Transnasal Humidified Rapid Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange vs. Awake Extubation: An Open-Labeled Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jin Qiu; Mian Xie; Jie Chen; Bing Chen; Yuanjing Chen; Xiwen Zhu; Hui Lin; Tao Zhu; Guangyou Duan; He Huang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-03

3.  Lung ultrasonography as a tool to guide perioperative atelectasis treatment bundle in head and neck cancer patients undergoing free flap reconstructive surgeries: a preliminary observational study.

Authors:  Nitika Goel; Indu Mohini Sen; Jaimanti Bakshi
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-29

4.  Perioperative hypoxemia is common with horizontal positioning during general anesthesia and is associated with major adverse outcomes: a retrospective study of consecutive patients.

Authors:  C Michael Dunham; Barbara M Hileman; Amy E Hutchinson; Elisha A Chance; Gregory S Huang
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 5.  Intraoperative lung ultrasound: A clinicodynamic perspective.

Authors:  Amit Kumar Mittal; Namrata Gupta
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.