Literature DB >> 7857533

Advances in image-directed neurosurgery: preliminary experience with the ISG Viewing Wand compared with the Leksell G frame.

D R Sandeman1, N Patel, C Chandler, R J Nelson, H B Coakham, H B Griffith.   

Abstract

Because of the limited application of frame-based stereotaxy to general neurosurgical procedures, we have carried out a preliminary evaluation of the ISG Viewing Wand, a frameless image-directed surgical system that is based on the rapid reformat and accurate three-dimensional reconstruction capability of parallel processor-based computer technology. We have compared the first 36 cases carried out with the system in the Frenchay Neurosurgery Department with a retrospective analysis of the previous 36 cases carried out using the Leksell G frame. The stereotactic cases were completed over a period of 15 months, representing 2.8% of intracranial procedures. The wand cases were completed in 3 months, 13% of the intracranial practice during that time. The wand was used for 28 supratentorial craniotomies (76%), four infratentorial procedures (11%) and five biopsy procedures (13%). Conventional stereotaxy was not used for posterior fossa or skull base procedures. Supratentorial craniotomy was carried out in nine cases (25%), while the remaining 27 cases involved point source localization within the cranium (75%). The mean preparation time prior to surgery was 65 min for the stereotactic cases and 37 min for the wand cases. We therefore conclude that the indications for frame-based stereotaxy and Viewing Wand use are mutually exclusive. Leksell stereotaxy remains the method of choice for point source localization deep within the cranium. All other procedures requiring an image-directed minimally invasive surgical approach are more appropriately carried out using the Viewing Wand. The system has potential immediate application in supratentorial, skull base and infratentorial tumour surgery, vascular surgery, epilepsy surgery and upper cervical spine surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7857533     DOI: 10.3109/02688699409002945

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0268-8697            Impact factor:   1.596


  6 in total

1.  Navigational maxillofacial surgery using virtual models.

Authors:  B Hohlweg-Majert; Ralf Schön; Rainer Schmelzeisen; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Alexander Schramm
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  [Robotics in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Possibilities, chances, risks].

Authors:  S Hassfeld; J Raczkowsky; P Bohner; C Hofele; C Holler; J Mühling; U Rembold
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  1997-11

Review 3.  Management of primary malignant brain tumours.

Authors:  I R Whittle
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 4.  Neuronavigation and surgery of intracerebral tumours.

Authors:  P W A Willems; J W Berkelbach van der Sprenkel; C A F Tulleken; M A Viergever; M J B Taphoorn
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 5.  The changing role of stereotaxis in surgical neuro-oncology.

Authors:  Mark E Linskey
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2004 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Combination of needle aspiration and core needle biopsy: A new technique of stereotactic biopsy.

Authors:  Abrar Ahad Wani; M Afzal Wani; Altaf U Ramzan; Furqan A Nizami; Nayil K Malik; S Shafiq; Rais Ahmad; Ashish Kumar; Iqbal Lone; Rumana Makhdoomi
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.