Literature DB >> 9490216

[Robotics in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Possibilities, chances, risks].

S Hassfeld1, J Raczkowsky, P Bohner, C Hofele, C Holler, J Mühling, U Rembold.   

Abstract

Robot systems are being tested in stereotactic neurosurgical interventions, orthopedic surgery of the hip or knee and advancal endoscopic systems for minimally invasive surgery. In contrast to most industrially manufactured products, objects for medical treatment are characterized by plasticity as well as by complex and individual forms. Thus, features of robots in this field have to be further developed in terms of advanced sensory and specific micromotoric systems. Safety and cooperation between surgeon and robot on the patient in the operating room have to be guaranteed. Extensive three-dimensional diagnosis, computer-aided planning and simulation of the intervention as well as sensory systems that monitor the actual performance of the operation are mandatory parts of this concept. In our interdisciplinary study, we aim to examine whether a robot-given a complete preoperative planning and simulation procedure-is able to perform certain surgical operations more precisely than the surgeon. Examples are drilling with depth control, shaping of bone surface by milling, sawing with defined depth in cranial osteotomies, defined preparation of implant sites and the positioning and insertion of dental and other surgical implants, whereby autonomous employment of the robot is not that which is aspired to in these interventions but rather the interactive support of the surgeon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9490216     DOI: 10.1007/BF03043575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir        ISSN: 1432-9417


  16 in total

1.  Building a hybrid patient's model for augmented reality in surgery: a registration problem.

Authors:  S Lavallée; P Cinquin; R Szeliski; O Peria; A Hamadeh; G Champleboux; J Troccaz
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.589

2.  Vision-based object registration for real-time image overlay.

Authors:  M Uenohara; T Kanade
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.589

3.  Virtual reality and telepresence for military medicine.

Authors:  R M Satava
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.589

4.  Computer-assisted three-dimensional planning in craniofacial surgery.

Authors:  D E Altobelli; R Kikinis; J B Mulliken; H Cline; W Lorensen; F Jolesz
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Computer-assisted neurosurgery system: Wayne State University hardware and software configuration.

Authors:  L Zamorano; Z Jiang; A M Kadi
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.790

6.  AESOP robotic arm.

Authors:  S W Unger; H M Unger; R T Bass
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  NASA high performance computing, communications, image processing, and data visualization-potential applications to medicine.

Authors:  C A Kukkonen
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.460

8.  Comparison of robotic versus human laparoscopic camera control .

Authors:  L R Kavoussi; R G Moore; J B Adams; A W Partin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Advances in interactive craniofacial surgery planning by 3D simulation and visualization.

Authors:  S Girod; E Keeve; B Girod
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.789

10.  Robot for CT-guided stereotactic neurosurgery.

Authors:  H Fankhauser; D Glauser; P Flury; Y Piguet; M Epitaux; J Favre; R A Meuli
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.875

View more
  1 in total

1.  Image-guided surgery and medical robotics in the cranial area.

Authors:  G Widmann
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2007-01-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.