Literature DB >> 7856698

The impact of mandated in-hospital coverage on primary cesarean delivery rates in a large nonuniversity teaching hospital.

S K Klasko1, R V Cummings, J Balducci, J D DeFulvio, J F Reed.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether attending physician call status affected the primary cesarean delivery rates of the resident or private services after institution of in-hospital coverage. STUDY
DESIGN: Data for the study year, during which in-hospital attending coverage was in place, were compared with those of the previous year, during which in-hospital attending coverage of residents was not in place. Birth records were analyzed retrospectively for physician and patient factors.
RESULTS: For the year before in-hospital coverage the institutional total cesarean rate was 24.9%, with a primary cesarean section rate of 17.6%. In the first year of coverage the total cesarean delivery was 21.7%, with a decrease in the primary rate to 15.3%. The resident service primary cesarean delivery rate was 10.6% during the study year, which was unchanged from 10.9% the prior year and did not contribute to the overall decrease. Conversely, the private service primary cesarean rate decreased from 18.0% in the prestudy year to 13.4% when the attending physician was on call in the hospital but remained higher at 17.5% when the attending physician was on call not in the hospital.
CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital attending physician coverage lowered individual attending physicians' private service primary cesarean rates. Resident service primary cesarean rates were lower than private service and were unaffected by the initiation of in-hospital coverage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7856698     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90585-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  4 in total

1.  Obstetrician call schedule and obstetric outcomes among women eligible for a trial of labor after cesarean.

Authors:  Lynn M Yee; Lilly Y Liu; William A Grobman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Two practice models in one labor and delivery unit: association with cesarean delivery rates.

Authors:  Malini Anand Nijagal; Miriam Kuppermann; Sanae Nakagawa; Yvonne Cheng
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  The Challenges and Achievements in the Implementation of the Natural Childbirth Instruction Program: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Reza Dehnavieh; Rahil Ghorbani Nia; Zahra Nazeri
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2020-11-07

4.  Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop.

Authors:  Catherine Y Spong; Vincenzo Berghella; Katharine D Wenstrom; Brian M Mercer; George R Saade
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 7.661

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.