Literature DB >> 7855972

Long-term experience utilizing a new balloon expandable prostatic endoprosthesis: the Titan stent. North American Titan Stent Study Group.

S A Kaplan1, R K Chiou, W J Morton, P G Katz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the long-term safety and efficacy of the Titan endoprosthesis as a therapeutic alternative in the management of men with bladder outlet obstruction.
METHODS: One hundred forty-four patients (mean age, 73.5 years +/- 4.2) had placement of the Titan stent. The stents were inserted under direct vision and expanded to 33 F using a balloon catheter. Of the 144 patients, 59 (41%) were in urinary retention and 85 (59%) presented with moderate to severe symptoms of prostatism. Patients were assessed at baseline and in follow-up at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Parameters of evaluation included the Madsen-Iversen symptom questionnaire, peak flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual urine volume (PVR), and incidence of adverse events.
RESULTS: At 24 months, for the retention cohort, symptoms, Qmax, and PVR were 5.21 +/- 0.81, 11.34 +/- 1.12 mL/s, and 31.00 +/- 12.8 mL, respectively (P < 0.002). For patients with symptoms of bladder outlet obstruction, the results were as follows at 24 months: (1) symptoms decreased from 15.89 +/- 0.47 to 9.33 +/- 0.86 (P < 0.001); (2) Qmax increased from 8.59 +/- 0.41 mL/s to 11.43 +/- 1.12 mL/s (P < 0.001); and (3) PVR decreased from 116.94 +/- 19.95 mL to 74.4 +/- 36.2 mL (P < 0.03). There were minimal complications; stents were removed from 28 patients (19%) because of migration, 10 of which were placed by one investigator.
CONCLUSIONS: When properly placed, the Titan stent was an effective therapeutic alternative to prostatectomy or long-term catheterization in high-risk obstructed patients or those in urinary retention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7855972     DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(95)80011-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  3 in total

1.  [S2e guideline of the German urologists: Instrumental treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia].

Authors:  T Bschleipfer; T Bach; R Berges; K Dreikorn; C Gratzke; S Madersbacher; M-S Michel; R Muschter; M Oelke; O Reich; C Tschuschke; K Höfner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Treatment options for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  A J Portis; D R Mador
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 3.  Use of prostatic stents for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in high-risk patients.

Authors:  J S Lam; M A Volpe; S A Kaplan
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.862

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.