Literature DB >> 12084252

Use of prostatic stents for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in high-risk patients.

J S Lam1, M A Volpe, S A Kaplan.   

Abstract

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a frequent disease in men and a major cause of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or open surgery remains the gold standard of treatment for symptomatic BPH. However, 10% to 15% of patients with BPH cannot undergo surgery due to grave concomitant diseases. For patients presenting with contraindications to surgery or anesthesia, several minimally invasive alternative treatment modalities are available. One such therapeutic alternative is prostatic stenting, which can serve as a temporary or permanent solution for bladder outlet obstruction caused by BPH. Although not a new concept, this is a relatively new treatment modality in the United States, primarily because of the strict regulatory forces governing the use of these devices. Prostatic urethral stents have been widely demonstrated to be safe and effective for the treatment of symptomatic BPH. In addition to being minimally invasive, prostatic stenting is generally rapid, easy to perform, immediately effective, and has a low cost compared with conventional surgical treatment. Prostatic stents are therefore well suited to treat the frail elderly patient who would not be able to withstand the stress of undergoing surgery. This report reviews the current use of prostatic urethral stents in the treatment of high-risk surgical patients with BPH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 12084252     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-001-0064-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   2.862


  27 in total

Review 1.  Benign prostatic hyperplasia. Medical and minimally invasive treatment options.

Authors:  J E Oesterling
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-01-12       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Transluminally-placed coilspring endarterial tube grafts. Long-term patency in canine popliteal artery.

Authors:  C T Dotter
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1969 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  Self-retaining intraurethral stent: an alternative to long-term indwelling catheters or surgery in the treatment of prostatism.

Authors:  D Yachia; D Lask; S Rabinson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Percutaneous endovascular stents: an experimental evaluation.

Authors:  K C Wright; S Wallace; C Charnsangavej; C H Carrasco; C Gianturco
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Intraprostatic metal stents (Prostakath and Urospiral): more than 6 years' clinical experience with 110 patients.

Authors:  Z Braf; J Chen; M Sofer; H Matzkin
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Prostatic UroLume Wallstent for benign prostatic hyperplasia patients at poor operative risk: clinical, uroflowmetric and ultrasonographic patterns.

Authors:  G Guazzoni; F Bergamaschi; F Montorsi; P Consonni; L Galli; V Matozzo; P Rigatti
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Prostatic UroLume Wallstent for urinary retention due to advanced prostate cancer: a 1-year followup study.

Authors:  G Guazzoni; F Montorsi; F Bergamaschi; P Consonni; P Rigatti
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Long-term experience utilizing a new balloon expandable prostatic endoprosthesis: the Titan stent. North American Titan Stent Study Group.

Authors:  S A Kaplan; R K Chiou; W J Morton; P G Katz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  A new, large calibre, self-expanding and self-retaining temporary intraprostatic stent (ProstaCoil) in the treatment of prostatic obstruction.

Authors:  D Yachia; M Beyar; I A Aridogan
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1994-07

10.  The North American experience with the UroLume endoprosthesis as a treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia: long-term results. The North American UroLume Study Group.

Authors:  J E Oesterling; S A Kaplan; H B Epstein; A J Defalco; P K Reddy; M B Chancellor
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  4 in total

1.  Differences in stress response between patients undergoing transurethral resection versus endoscopic laser ablation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Goran Bedalov; Zeljko Bartolin; Damir Puskar; Ivan Savić; Ivana Bedalov; Marija Rudolf; Drago Batinić
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2007-04-28       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Urethral Stenting for Obstructive Uropathy Utilizing Digital Radiography for Guidance: Feasibility and Clinical Outcome in 26 Dogs.

Authors:  A Radhakrishnan
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2017-01-29       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 3.  Biomaterials in urology.

Authors:  Darren T Beiko; Bodo E Knudsen; James D Watterson; John D Denstedt
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.862

Review 4.  Modern best practice in the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia in the elderly.

Authors:  Eric Bortnick; Conner Brown; Vannita Simma-Chiang; Steven A Kaplan
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2020-05-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.