Literature DB >> 78527

Treatment of constipation in geriatric and chronically ill patients: a comparison.

A M Fain, R Susat, M Herring, K Dorton.   

Abstract

The difficulties of adequately managing constipation, particulary in patients with impaired or limited mobility as a result of surgery, cardiovascular or cerebral disease, or advanced age, led us to evaluate the use of stool softeners in a homogeneous group of institutionalized patients. Comparison was made between dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate (DSS) (Colace), q.d. and b.i.d., and dioctyl calcium sulfosuccinate (DCS) (Surfak), q.d. Analysis of results showed 81% of the patients receiving DCS improved, a significant result (P is less than .02) when assessed by the sign test. By contrast, DSS caused no significant improvement over placebo, regardless of whether it was administered once or twice a day. The mean number of natural bowel movements among the DCS group increased approximately 62% over the placebo period, more than twice the 30% increase seen with DSS administered either b.i.d. or q.d. No adverse reactions were reported in any of the groups, and no significant study-induced changes occurred in laboratory measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 78527     DOI: 10.1097/00007611-197806000-00022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  South Med J        ISSN: 0038-4348            Impact factor:   0.954


  9 in total

1.  Lack of objective evidence of efficacy of laxatives in chronic constipation.

Authors:  Michael P Jones; Nicholas J Talley; Guy Nuyts; Dominique Dubois
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Recommendations on chronic constipation (including constipation associated with irritable bowel syndrome) treatment.

Authors:  P Paré; Ronald Bridges; Malcolm C Champion; Subhas C Ganguli; James R Gray; E Jan Irvine; Victor Plourde; Pierre Poitras; Geoffrey K Turnbull; Paul Moayyedi; Nigel Flook; Stephen M Collins
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 3.  What's the 'best buy' for treatment of constipation? Results of a systematic review of the efficacy and comparative efficacy of laxatives in the elderly.

Authors:  M Petticrew; I Watt; M Brand
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 4.  Constipation in people prescribed opioids.

Authors:  Sam H Ahmedzai; Jason Boland
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2010-04-06

Review 5.  Practical treatments for constipation in Korea.

Authors:  Kyung-Sik Park; Suck-Chei Choi; Moo-In Park; Jeong-Eun Shin; Kee-Wook Jung; Seong-Eun Kim; Tae-Hee Lee; Hoon-Sup Koo
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.884

Review 6.  Lubiprostone for the treatment of adults with constipation and irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  Ron Schey; Satish S C Rao
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  Epidemiology of constipation in elderly patients. Drug utilisation and cost-containment strategies.

Authors:  F A Lederle
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 8.  Medical Management of Constipation in Elderly Patients: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Seung Joo Kang; Young Sin Cho; Tae Hee Lee; Seong-Eun Kim; Han Seung Ryu; Jung-Wook Kim; Seon-Young Park; Yoo Jin Lee; Jeong Eun Shin
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 4.924

9.  Laxative Use and Change in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Keiichi Sumida; Ankur A Dashputre; Praveen K Potukuchi; Fridtjof Thomas; Yoshitsugu Obi; Miklos Z Molnar; Justin D Gatwood; Elani Streja; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Csaba P Kovesdy
Journal:  J Ren Nutr       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 4.354

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.