Literature DB >> 7850560

Costs and benefits of picture archiving and communication systems.

S H Becker1, R L Arenson.   

Abstract

A picture archiving and communication system (PACS) is an electronic and ideally filmless information system for acquiring, sorting, transporting, storing, and electronically displaying medical images. PACS have developed rapidly and are in operation in a number of hospitals. Before widespread adoption of PACSs can occur, however, their cost-effectiveness must be proven. This article introduces the basic components of a PACS. The current PACS cost-analysis literature is reviewed. Some authors conclude that the PACS would pay for itself, while others find the PACS much more expensive. Explanations for these differences are explored. Almost all of these studies focus on direct costs and ignore indirect costs and benefits. The literature characterizing the indirect costs of PACS is reviewed. The authors conclude that there is a need for uniform, well-defined criteria for the calculation of the costs and savings of PACSs.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7850560      PMCID: PMC116218          DOI: 10.1136/jamia.1994.95153424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  25 in total

1.  Overview of CAPACITY data.

Authors:  E M van Gennip; K Heiska; G J Kemerink; O Ratib; R Rechid; R van den Broeck; L J van Erning; B M van Poppel; W J Verra; R Warburton
Journal:  Int J Biomed Comput       Date:  1992-05

2.  PACS experiences in Trieste.

Authors:  P Giribona; D Bravar; F Stacul; W Ukovich
Journal:  Int J Biomed Comput       Date:  1992-05

3.  Clinical experience with PACS at the University of Pennsylvania.

Authors:  H L Kundel; S B Seshadri; R L Arenson
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.790

4.  PACS--clinical experience at UCLA.

Authors:  H Kangarloo
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.790

5.  PACS clinical experience at Georgetown University.

Authors:  S C Horii; S K Mun; B Levine; B Lo; B S Garra; R K Zeman; M Freedman; C Leftridge; D Schellinger; J Keyes
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.790

6.  PACS workstation design.

Authors:  B K Ho; O Ratib; S C Horii
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.790

7.  Picture archiving and communication system (PACS) networking: three implementation strategies.

Authors:  B K Stewart; J C Honeyman; S J Dwyer
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.790

8.  Clinical experience--16 months of HU-PACS.

Authors:  G Irie; K Miyasaka
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.790

9.  HIS, RIS, and PACS.

Authors:  A R Bakker
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.790

10.  Digital imaging at a community hospital: implications for hospital stays and teleradiology.

Authors:  R N Warburton
Journal:  Int J Biomed Comput       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug
View more
  10 in total

1.  Significant savings in radiologic report turnaround time after implementation of a complete picture archiving and communication system (PACS).

Authors:  A A Twair; W C Torreggiani; S M Mahmud; N Ramesh; B Hogan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  Impacts of e-health on the outcomes of care in low- and middle-income countries: where do we go from here?

Authors:  John D Piette; K C Lun; Lincoln A Moura; Hamish S F Fraser; Patricia N Mechael; John Powell; Shariq R Khoja
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 9.408

3.  Evaluating the implementation of picture archiving and communication systems in Newfoundland and Labrador--a cost benefit analysis.

Authors:  Don MacDonald; Doreen Neville
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS): Clinician's Perspective About Filmless Imaging.

Authors:  G J Jorwekar; K N Dandekar; P K Baviskar
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 0.656

5.  A methodology for the economic assessment of picture archiving and communication systems.

Authors:  C P Langlotz; O Even-Shoshan; S S Seshadri; I Brikman; S Kishore; H L Kundel; J S Schwartz
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Using agent-based technology to create a cost effective, integrated, multimedia view of the electronic medical record.

Authors:  H J Lowe; W K Walker; J K Vries
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1995

7.  Recommendations for responsible monitoring and regulation of clinical software systems. American Medical Informatics Association, Computer-based Patient Record Institute, Medical Library Association, Association of Academic Health Science Libraries, American Health Information Management Association, American Nurses Association.

Authors:  R A Miller; R M Gardner
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  A socio-technical assessment of the success of Picture Archiving and Communication Systems: the radiology technologist's perspective.

Authors:  Wen-Sheng Tzeng; Kuang-Ming Kuo; Huang-Wei Lin; Tai-Yuan Chen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Study on user interface of pathology picture archiving and communication system.

Authors:  Dasueran Kim; Peter Kang; Jungmin Yun; Sung-Hye Park; Jeong-Wook Seo; Peom Park
Journal:  Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2014-01-31

10.  Impact of duplicate CT scan rate after implementation of transfer image repository system at a level 1 trauma center.

Authors:  Charles W Sheppard; Amy L Groll; Cindy L Austin; Simon J Thompson
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2018-01-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.