BACKGROUND: In recent years, many trauma centers have been closing or scaling down their operations because of financial losses and lack of commitment by the relevant authorities. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of commitment to trauma and the establishment of a dedicated trauma program on injury outcome. DESIGN: In 1992, a well-funded dedicated trauma program was implemented at the Los Angeles County--University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles. We analyzed the outcome in severely injured patients (Injury Severity Score [ISS] > 15) before and after implementation of the program (1991 and 1993). SETTING: Large, urban, level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Patients with trauma and an ISS higher than 15. RESULTS: There were 737 patients with an ISS higher than 15 in 1991 and 812 patients with an ISS higher than 15 in 1993. The overall mortality rate was 30% in 1991 and 24.5% in 1993 (P = .018), which is a reduction by 18.3%. In patients with blunt trauma and an ISS higher than 15, mortality was reduced by 33% (mortality rate of 31.1% in 1991 vs 20.8% in 1993) (P < .002). Mortality in patients with penetrating trauma and an ISS higher than 30 was reduced by 42.7% (mortality rate of 59.3% in 1991 vs 34% in 1993) (P = .019). There was also a trend toward lower permanent disabilities among survivors with an ISS higher than 15 (14.7% in 1991 vs 11.3% in 1993). CONCLUSION: Commitment of financial and human resources for the establishment of a dedicated trauma program is a sound investment in terms of improved survival and fewer permanent disabilities in critically injured patients.
BACKGROUND: In recent years, many trauma centers have been closing or scaling down their operations because of financial losses and lack of commitment by the relevant authorities. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of commitment to trauma and the establishment of a dedicated trauma program on injury outcome. DESIGN: In 1992, a well-funded dedicated trauma program was implemented at the Los Angeles County--University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles. We analyzed the outcome in severely injured patients (Injury Severity Score [ISS] > 15) before and after implementation of the program (1991 and 1993). SETTING: Large, urban, level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Patients with trauma and an ISS higher than 15. RESULTS: There were 737 patients with an ISS higher than 15 in 1991 and 812 patients with an ISS higher than 15 in 1993. The overall mortality rate was 30% in 1991 and 24.5% in 1993 (P = .018), which is a reduction by 18.3%. In patients with blunt trauma and an ISS higher than 15, mortality was reduced by 33% (mortality rate of 31.1% in 1991 vs 20.8% in 1993) (P < .002). Mortality in patients with penetrating trauma and an ISS higher than 30 was reduced by 42.7% (mortality rate of 59.3% in 1991 vs 34% in 1993) (P = .019). There was also a trend toward lower permanent disabilities among survivors with an ISS higher than 15 (14.7% in 1991 vs 11.3% in 1993). CONCLUSION: Commitment of financial and human resources for the establishment of a dedicated trauma program is a sound investment in terms of improved survival and fewer permanent disabilities in critically injured patients.
Authors: Colleen D Acosta; M Kit Delgado; Michael A Gisondi; Amritha Raghunathan; Peter A D'Souza; Gregory Gilbert; David A Spain; Patrice Christensen; N Ewen Wang Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: David T Harrington; Michael Connolly; Walter L Biffl; Sarah D Majercik; William G Cioffi Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Corinne Bunn; Sujay Kulshrestha; Bianca Di Chiaro; Uma Maduekwe; Zaid M Abdelsattar; Marshall S Baker; Fred A Luchette; Sonya Agnew Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2021-04-20 Impact factor: 6.532